These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Vogel JP; Betrán AP; Vindevoghel N; Souza JP; Torloni MR; Zhang J; Tunçalp Ö; Mori R; Morisaki N; Ortiz-Panozo E; Hernandez B; Pérez-Cuevas R; Qureshi Z; Gülmezoglu AM; Temmerman M; Lancet Glob Health; 2015 May; 3(5):e260-70. PubMed ID: 25866355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Cesarean section in the Burgundy perinatal network: reasons for differences in the management of mothers. Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2003; 31: 606-613]. Rudigoz RC Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Feb; 32(2):186-7. PubMed ID: 15123146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of the caesarean section rate using the 10-Group Robson classification at Benha University Hospital, Egypt. Jadoon B; Assar TM; Nucier AAAR; Raziq HEA; Abd El-Azym Saad AS; Megahed Amer W Women Birth; 2020 Mar; 33(2):e105-e110. PubMed ID: 30987799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) - a common starting point for more detailed analysis. Robson M BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):701. PubMed ID: 25600521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Rates of caesarean section and neonatal mortality. Taylor U; Zentay Z; Ganesh V; Apuzzio J; Murphy G; Iffy L Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 32(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 1445126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An audit of caesarean section in a maternity district. Rosenberg K; Hepburn M; McIlwaine G Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Oct; 89(10):787-92. PubMed ID: 7126498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [C-Section: little but enough information to put a stop to the inadequacy]. Campillo Artero C Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 25028299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Association between epidural analgesia and indications for intrapartum caesarean delivery in group 1 of the 10-group classification system at a tertiary maternity hospital, Shanghai, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lin R; Shi P; Li H; Liu Z; Xu Z BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jun; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34187400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improving the Caesarean Decision by Robson Classification: A Population-Based Study by 5,323,500 Livebirth Data. Tontus HO; Nebioglu S Ann Glob Health; 2020 Aug; 86(1):101. PubMed ID: 32874932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sociodemographic Determinants of Caesarean Delivery in the Largest Public Maternity Hospital in Angola. Nimi T; Costa D; Campos P; Barros H Acta Med Port; 2019 Jun; 32(6):434-440. PubMed ID: 31292024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study. Zimmo MW; Laine K; Hassan S; Bottcher B; Fosse E; Ali-Masri H; Zimmo K; Sørum Falk R; Lieng M; Vikanes Å BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022875. PubMed ID: 30361403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital. Mayne L; Liu C; Tanaka K; Amoako A J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 33938362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system. Kelly S; Sprague A; Fell DB; Murphy P; Aelicks N; Guo Y; Fahey J; Lauzon L; Scott H; Lee L; Kinniburgh B; Prince M; Walker M J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Mar; 35(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 23470108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Eighteen years of maternity care in a new teaching hospital. Roopnarinesingh S; Bassaw B; Sirjusingh A; Roopnarinesingh A Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2000; 27(3-4):223-4. PubMed ID: 11214958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Trend of caesarean section rate and puerpera characteristics: based on Robson classification]. Wang JX; Sun HQ; Huang K; Zheng XF; Tao FB Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 38(7):963-967. PubMed ID: 28738475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Is the high frequency of Caesarean sections in a highly specialized gyneco-obstetric hospital justifiable?]. Guzmán Ibarra Mde L; Ablanedo Aguirre J; Basavilvazo Rodríguez MA; Martínez Rodríguez OA; Ahumada Ramírez E Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2003 Jun; 71():291-6. PubMed ID: 14515659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Delivery after cesarean section based on the data of the Obstetrical-Gynecological Clinic of the Higher Medical Institute in Plovdiv for the period of 1984-1988]. Milchev N; Pekhlivanov B; Piperkov T; Masarliev A; Amaliev I Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(3):8-11. PubMed ID: 2252157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Caesarean section among immigrants with different obstetrical risks. Trinh LTT; Assareh H; Achat H; Chua S; Guevarra V Int J Nurs Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):e12638. PubMed ID: 29520886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in Brazil. Almeida Sd; Bettiol H; Barbieri MA; Silva AA; Ribeiro VS Cad Saude Publica; 2008 Dec; 24(12):2909-18. PubMed ID: 19082282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]