238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25559769)
1. AucPR: an AUC-based approach using penalized regression for disease prediction with high-dimensional omics data.
Yu W; Park T
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S1. PubMed ID: 25559769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cross-validated AUC for MCP-logistic regression with high-dimensional data.
Jiang D; Huang J; Zhang Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Oct; 22(5):505-18. PubMed ID: 22127580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the modified unbounded penalty and the LASSO to select predictive genes of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Collignon O; Han J; An H; Oh S; Lee Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204897. PubMed ID: 30273405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sparse logistic regression with Lp penalty for biomarker identification.
Liu Z; Jiang F; Tian G; Wang S; Sato F; Meltzer SJ; Tan M
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article6. PubMed ID: 17402921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing and validating a clinlabomics-based machine-learning model for early detection of retinal detachment in patients with high myopia.
Li S; Li M; Wu J; Li Y; Han J; Song Y; Cao W; Zhou X
J Transl Med; 2024 Apr; 22(1):405. PubMed ID: 38689321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regularized ROC method for disease classification and biomarker selection with microarray data.
Ma S; Huang J
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(24):4356-62. PubMed ID: 16234316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. IPF-LASSO: Integrative
Boulesteix AL; De Bin R; Jiang X; Fuchs M
Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():7691937. PubMed ID: 28546826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating prior knowledge of predictors into penalized classifiers with multiple penalty terms.
Tai F; Pan W
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(14):1775-82. PubMed ID: 17483507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n case.
Liao JG; Chin KV
Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(15):1945-51. PubMed ID: 17540680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Study of Domain Adaptation Classifiers Derived From Logistic Regression for the Task of Splice Site Prediction.
Herndon N; Caragea D
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2016 Mar; 15(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 26849871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. White box radial basis function classifiers with component selection for clinical prediction models.
Van Belle V; Lisboa P
Artif Intell Med; 2014 Jan; 60(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 24262978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores.
Wang Z; Chang YC
Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tumor classification ranking from microarray data.
Hewett R; Kijsanayothin P
BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. PubMed ID: 18831787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimized application of penalized regression methods to diverse genomic data.
Waldron L; Pintilie M; Tsao MS; Shepherd FA; Huttenhower C; Jurisica I
Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 27(24):3399-406. PubMed ID: 22156367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AUC-RF: a new strategy for genomic profiling with random forest.
Calle ML; Urrea V; Boulesteix AL; Malats N
Hum Hered; 2011; 72(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 21996641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of distribution algorithms as logistic regression regularizers of microarray classifiers.
Bielza C; Robles V; Larranaga P
Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 19387512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An extension of the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC-optimal classification.
Takenouchi T; Komori O; Eguchi S
Neural Comput; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2789-824. PubMed ID: 22734493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Logistic LASSO and Elastic Net to Characterize Vitamin D Deficiency in a Hypertensive Obese Population.
Garcia-Carretero R; Vigil-Medina L; Barquero-Perez O; Mora-Jimenez I; Soguero-Ruiz C; Goya-Esteban R; Ramos-Lopez J
Metab Syndr Relat Disord; 2020 Mar; 18(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 31928513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct ChIP-Seq significance analysis improves target prediction.
Bansal M; Mendiratta G; Anand S; Kushwaha R; Kim R; Kustagi M; Iyer A; Chaganti RS; Califano A; Sumazin P
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 26040656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
