These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25560478)

  • 1. Early UCSF contributions to the development of multiple-channel cochlear implants.
    Merzenich MM
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():39-46. PubMed ID: 25560478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The early days of the multi channel cochlear implant: efforts and achievement in France.
    Chouard CH
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():47-51. PubMed ID: 25499127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():24-38. PubMed ID: 25500178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
    Clark GM
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The contributions of William F. House to the field of implantable auditory devices.
    Eisenberg LS
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():52-6. PubMed ID: 25159272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognizing the journey and celebrating the achievement of cochlear implants.
    Zeng FG; Canlon B
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():1-3. PubMed ID: 25819292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants.
    Jeschke M; Moser T
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():224-34. PubMed ID: 25601298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.
    Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():57-66. PubMed ID: 25449009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants.
    Hochmair I; Hochmair E; Nopp P; Waller M; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():14-23. PubMed ID: 25456089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants.
    Langner F; Saoji AA; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():96-107. PubMed ID: 28104408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.
    Svirsky MA; Talavage TM; Sinha S; Neuburger H; Azadpour M
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():163-70. PubMed ID: 25445816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.
    Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():67-76. PubMed ID: 25445817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimising the effect of noise reduction algorithm ClearVoice in cochlear implant users by increasing the maximum comfort levels.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):230-235. PubMed ID: 29065731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of the Nurotron 26-electrode cochlear implant system.
    Zeng FG; Rebscher SJ; Fu QJ; Chen H; Sun X; Yin L; Ping L; Feng H; Yang S; Gong S; Yang B; Kang HY; Gao N; Chi F
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():188-99. PubMed ID: 25281795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of cochlear health for implant function.
    Pfingst BE; Zhou N; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Garadat SN; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Budenz CL; Raphael Y; Zwolan TA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():77-88. PubMed ID: 25261772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PET-imaging of brain plasticity after cochlear implantation.
    Strelnikov K; Marx M; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():180-7. PubMed ID: 25448166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():127-37. PubMed ID: 25193553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
    Whitmal NA; DeMaio D; Lin R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.