915 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25560567)
1. Nurses', midwives' and key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of a scope of nursing and midwifery practice framework.
Casey M; Fealy G; Kennedy C; Hegarty J; Prizeman G; McNamara M; O'Reilly P; Brady AM; Rohde D
J Adv Nurs; 2015 Jun; 71(6):1227-37. PubMed ID: 25560567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurses', midwives' and key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions on requirements to demonstrate the maintenance of professional competence.
Casey M; Cooney A; O' Connell R; Hegarty JM; Brady AM; O' Reilly P; Kennedy C; Heffernan E; Fealy G; McNamara M; O' Connor L
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Mar; 73(3):653-664. PubMed ID: 27683071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facilitators and barriers in expanding scope of practice: findings from a national survey of Irish nurses and midwives.
Fealy GM; Rohde D; Casey M; Brady AM; Hegarty J; Kennedy C; McNamara M; O'Reilly P; Prizeman G
J Clin Nurs; 2015 Dec; 24(23-24):3615-26. PubMed ID: 26373786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scope of practice decision making: findings from a national survey of Irish nurses and midwives.
Fealy G; Casey M; Rohde D; Brady AM; Hegarty J; Kennedy C; McNamara M; O'Reilly P; Prizeman G
J Clin Nurs; 2015 Oct; 24(19-20):2871-80. PubMed ID: 26095297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of nursing and midwifery regulatory and professional bodies' scope of practice and associated decision-making frameworks: a discussion paper.
Kennedy C; O'Reilly P; Fealy G; Casey M; Brady AM; McNamara M; Prizeman G; Rohde D; Hegarty J
J Adv Nurs; 2015 Aug; 71(8):1797-811. PubMed ID: 25866070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Am I covered?': an analysis of a national enquiry database on scope of practice.
Brady AM; Fealy G; Casey M; Hegarty J; Kennedy C; McNamara M; O'Reilly P; Prizeman G; Rohde D
J Adv Nurs; 2015 Oct; 71(10):2402-12. PubMed ID: 26104858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midwives' perceptions of women's preferences related to midwifery care in Germany: A focus group study.
Lohmann S; Mattern E; Ayerle GM
Midwifery; 2018 Jun; 61():53-62. PubMed ID: 29529579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery.
Hunter B
Midwifery; 2004 Sep; 20(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 15337282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midwives and supervisors of midwives' perceptions of the statutory supervision of midwifery within the United Kingdom: a systematic review.
Henshaw AM; Clarke D; Long AF
Midwifery; 2013 Jan; 29(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 22172741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice.
Collins CT; Fereday J; Pincombe J; Oster C; Turnbull D
Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 19781827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Registered nurse and midwife experiences of using videoconferencing in practice: A systematic review of qualitative studies.
Penny RA; Bradford NK; Langbecker D
J Clin Nurs; 2018 Mar; 27(5-6):e739-e752. PubMed ID: 29149507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Continuing professional development and changed re-registration requirements: midwives' reflections.
Gray M; Rowe J; Barnes M
Nurse Educ Today; 2014 May; 34(5):860-5. PubMed ID: 24219922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How do midwives in Slovenia view their professional status?
Mivšek P; Pahor M; Hlebec V; Hundley V
Midwifery; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1193-201. PubMed ID: 26363604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.
Munro S; Kornelsen J; Grzybowski S
Midwifery; 2013 Jun; 29(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 22863239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The perceptions of key stakeholders of the roles of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practitioners.
Casey M; O'Connor L; Nicholson E; Smith R; O'Brien D; O'Leary D; Fealy GM; Mcnamara MS; Stokes D; Egan C
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Dec; 73(12):3007-3016. PubMed ID: 28618078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How do nurses and midwives perceive their preparedness for quality improvement and patient safety in practice? A cross-sectional national study in Ireland.
Gallen A; Kodate N; Casey D
Nurse Educ Today; 2019 May; 76():125-130. PubMed ID: 30784840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing an Australian framework for scope of practice decisions by nurses and midwives - lessons for cross-border standards development.
Fox-Young S; Ashley C
J Clin Nurs; 2010 Aug; 19(15-16):2235-41. PubMed ID: 20550624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reviewing and reflecting on practice: the midwives experiences of credentialling.
Smith R; Brodie P; Homer CS
Women Birth; 2012 Dec; 25(4):159-65. PubMed ID: 21900063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing midwifery practice through work-based learning: an exploratory study.
Marshall JE
Nurse Educ Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 22749493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
