These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25561069)

  • 1. Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.
    Lacson R; Harris K; Brawarsky P; Tosteson TD; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Kaye A; Gonzalez I; Birdwell R; Haas JS
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):567-75. PubMed ID: 25561069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing Inaccuracies in Automated Information Extraction of Breast Imaging Findings.
    Lacson R; Goodrich ME; Harris K; Brawarsky P; Haas JS
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 27844217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing the Efficiency on Producing Radiology Reports for Breast Cancer Diagnosis by Means of Structured Reports. A Comparative Study.
    Segrelles JD; Medina R; Blanquer I; Martí-Bonmatí L
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):248-260. PubMed ID: 28220929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Challenges With Identifying Indication for Examination in Breast Imaging as a Key Clinical Attribute in Practice, Research, and Policy.
    Weiss JE; Goodrich M; Harris KA; Chicoine RE; Synnestvedt MB; Pyle SJ; Chen JS; Herschorn SD; Beaber EF; Haas JS; Tosteson AN; Onega T;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Feb; 14(2):198-207.e2. PubMed ID: 27744009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports.
    Bozkurt S; Lipson JA; Senol U; Rubin DL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Apr; 22(e1):e81-92. PubMed ID: 25352567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from radiology reports with natural language processing.
    Sippo DA; Warden GI; Andriole KP; Lacson R; Ikuta I; Birdwell RL; Khorasani R
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):989-94. PubMed ID: 23868515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital breast tomosynthesis].
    Preibsch H; Siegmann-Luz KC
    Radiologe; 2015 Jan; 55(1):59-67; quiz 68-70. PubMed ID: 25609581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.
    Bozkurt S; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Gulkesen KH; Rubin DL
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Aug; 62():224-31. PubMed ID: 27388877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information extraction from multi-institutional radiology reports.
    Hassanpour S; Langlotz CP
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Jan; 66():29-39. PubMed ID: 26481140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?
    Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K
    Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Communication Practices of Mammography Facilities and Timely Follow-up of a Screening Mammogram with a BI-RADS 0 Assessment.
    Schapira MM; Barlow WE; Conant EF; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Onega T; Beaber EF; Goodrich M; McCarthy AM; Herschorn SD; Skinner CS; Harrington TO; Geller B
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):1118-1127. PubMed ID: 29433892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials.
    Houssami N; Lång K; Bernardi D; Tagliafico A; Zackrisson S; Skaane P
    Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():119-34. PubMed ID: 27017251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.
    Castro SM; Tseytlin E; Medvedeva O; Mitchell K; Visweswaran S; Bekhuis T; Jacobson RS
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 May; 69():177-187. PubMed ID: 28428140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The implementation of natural language processing to extract index lesions from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.
    Liu Y; Liu Q; Han C; Zhang X; Wang X
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(1):288. PubMed ID: 31888615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium.
    Conant EF; Beaber EF; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Onega T; Tosteson AN; McCarthy AM; Poplack SP; Haas JS; Armstrong K; Schnall MD; Barlow WE
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 156(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 26931450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
    Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.