116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25562223)
1. An ethicist's scope of practice: equipping stakeholders for closure.
Kibbe B; Schmitt P; Ford PJ
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 25562223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Closure but no cigar.
Eisenberg L; Cunningham TV; Hester DM
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 25562227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Response to open peer commentaries on "Neglected ends: clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure".
Fiester A
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):W9-10. PubMed ID: 25562246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral distress and prospects for closure.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 25562224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensified conflict instead of closure: clinical ethics consultants' recommendations' potential to exacerbate ethical conflicts.
Antommaria AH
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 25562231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Power hierarchy and epistemic injustice in clinical ethics consultation.
Ho A; Unger D
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 25562225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond the recommendation: discerning achievable goals in clinical ethics consultation.
Fanning JB; Garrison NA; Churchill LR
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 25562226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Attend to the middle.
Dudzinski DM
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 25562228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Shared language and moral sensibility in resolving clinical ethics conflicts.
Muthusamy A
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 25562235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Facilitated discussion: good and good for you.
Latham S
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):58-9. PubMed ID: 25562234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Realistic goals and expectations for clinical ethics consultations: we should not overstate what we can deliver.
Shelton WN; White BD
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 25562232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What "the straw man" teaches us, or, finding wisdom between the horns of a false dilemma about ethics consultation methodology.
Spike JP
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 25562229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Philosophical counseling as an alternative process to bioethics mediation.
Matchett NJ
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 25562233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond recommendation and mediation: moral case deliberation as moral learning in dialogue.
Metselaar S; Molewijk B; Widdershoven G
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 25562230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Neglected ends: clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure.
Fiester A
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25562222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New approaches with surrogate decision makers.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 2014; 25(4):261-72. PubMed ID: 25517562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to Stephens and Heitman.
Wasserman JA
J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(3):270-1. PubMed ID: 26399678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Moral Reasoning among HEC Members: An Empirical Evaluation of the Relationship of Theory and Practice in Clinical Ethics Consultation.
Wasserman JA; Stevenson SL; Claxton C; Krug EF
J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 26132057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defining the Scope and Improving the Quality of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Response to Open Peer Commentaries About the National Collaborative.
Porter KM; Danis M; Taylor HA; Cho MK; Wilfond BS
Am J Bioeth; 2018 Feb; 18(2):W13-W15. PubMed ID: 29393779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dubious export: the moral perils of American-style ethics consultation.
Fiester A
Bioethics; 2013 Jan; 27(1):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 23215775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
