These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25562233)
1. Philosophical counseling as an alternative process to bioethics mediation. Matchett NJ Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 25562233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond recommendation and mediation: moral case deliberation as moral learning in dialogue. Metselaar S; Molewijk B; Widdershoven G Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 25562230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Power hierarchy and epistemic injustice in clinical ethics consultation. Ho A; Unger D Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 25562225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond the recommendation: discerning achievable goals in clinical ethics consultation. Fanning JB; Garrison NA; Churchill LR Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 25562226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Attend to the middle. Dudzinski DM Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 25562228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Closure but no cigar. Eisenberg L; Cunningham TV; Hester DM Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 25562227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to open peer commentaries on "Neglected ends: clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure". Fiester A Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):W9-10. PubMed ID: 25562246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral distress and prospects for closure. Morreim H Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 25562224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Shared language and moral sensibility in resolving clinical ethics conflicts. Muthusamy A Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 25562235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Facilitated discussion: good and good for you. Latham S Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):58-9. PubMed ID: 25562234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Realistic goals and expectations for clinical ethics consultations: we should not overstate what we can deliver. Shelton WN; White BD Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 25562232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What "the straw man" teaches us, or, finding wisdom between the horns of a false dilemma about ethics consultation methodology. Spike JP Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 25562229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An ethicist's scope of practice: equipping stakeholders for closure. Kibbe B; Schmitt P; Ford PJ Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 25562223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intensified conflict instead of closure: clinical ethics consultants' recommendations' potential to exacerbate ethical conflicts. Antommaria AH Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 25562231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Neglected ends: clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure. Fiester A Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25562222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moral Reasoning among HEC Members: An Empirical Evaluation of the Relationship of Theory and Practice in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Wasserman JA; Stevenson SL; Claxton C; Krug EF J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 26132057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response to Stephens and Heitman. Wasserman JA J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(3):270-1. PubMed ID: 26399678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioethics mediation: the role and importance of nursing advocacy. Schlairet MC Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(4):185-93. PubMed ID: 19631060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mediation and moral aporia. Fiester A J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(4):355-6. PubMed ID: 18320992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]