These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25562886)

  • 1. The surveillance error grid.
    Klonoff DC; Lias C; Vigersky R; Clarke W; Parkes JL; Sacks DB; Kirkman MS; Kovatchev B;
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 8(4):658-72. PubMed ID: 25562886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computing the surveillance error grid analysis: procedure and examples.
    Kovatchev BP; Wakeman CA; Breton MD; Kost GJ; Louie RF; Tran NK; Klonoff DC
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 8(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 25562887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Petruschke T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical aspects of the Parkes error grid.
    Pfützner A; Klonoff DC; Pardo S; Parkes JL
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1275-81. PubMed ID: 24124954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multisite evaluation of a new diabetes self-test for glucose and glycated protein (fructosamine).
    Edelman SV; Callahan P; Deeb LC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2000; 2(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 11469264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrospective Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data With the Surveillance Error Grid Supports Nonadjunctive Dosing Decisions.
    Welsh JB; Walker T; Price D
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 11(5):942-946. PubMed ID: 28617187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Multicenter Performance Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in 21 Leading Hospitals in Spain.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Petruschke T; Pardo S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 10(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 26253142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose.
    Parkes JL; Slatin SL; Pardo S; Ginsberg BH
    Diabetes Care; 2000 Aug; 23(8):1143-8. PubMed ID: 10937512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The performance of flash glucose monitoring in critically ill patients with diabetes.
    Ancona P; Eastwood GM; Lucchetta L; Ekinci EI; Bellomo R; Mårtensson J
    Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Jun; 19(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 28651513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of the Accuracy of 18 Marketed Blood Glucose Monitors.
    Klonoff DC; Parkes JL; Kovatchev BP; Kerr D; Bevier WC; Brazg RL; Christiansen M; Bailey TS; Nichols JH; Kohn MA
    Diabetes Care; 2018 Aug; 41(8):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 29898901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An insulin-dose error assessment grid: A new tool to evaluate glucose meter performance.
    Lyon ME; Lyon OAS; Tran NK; DuBois JA; Lyon AW
    Clin Biochem; 2019 Aug; 70():30-33. PubMed ID: 31170380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.
    Pfützner A; Mitri M; Musholt PB; Sachsenheimer D; Borchert M; Yap A; Forst T
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Apr; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 22435798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Diabetes Technology Society Error Grid and Trend Accuracy Matrix for Glucose Monitors.
    Klonoff DC; Freckmann G; Pleus S; Kovatchev BP; Kerr D; Tse CC; Li C; Agus MSD; Dungan K; Voglová Hagerf B; Krouwer JS; Lee WA; Misra S; Rhee SY; Sabharwal A; Seley JJ; Shah VN; Tran NK; Waki K; Worth C; Tian T; Aaron RE; Rutledge K; Ho CN; Ayers AT; Adler A; Ahn DT; Aktürk HK; Al-Sofiani ME; Bailey TS; Baker M; Bally L; Bannuru RR; Bauer EM; Bee YM; Blanchette JE; Cengiz E; Chase JG; Y Chen K; Cherñavvsky D; Clements M; Cote GL; Dhatariya KK; Drincic A; Ejskjaer N; Espinoza J; Fabris C; Fleming GA; Gabbay MAL; Galindo RJ; Gómez-Medina AM; Heinemann L; Hermanns N; Hoang T; Hussain S; Jacobs PG; Jendle J; Joshi SR; Koliwad SK; Lal RA; Leiter LA; Lind M; Mader JK; Maran A; Masharani U; Mathioudakis N; McShane M; Mehta C; Moon SJ; Nichols JH; O'Neal DN; Pasquel FJ; Peters AL; Pfützner A; Pop-Busui R; Ranjitkar P; Rhee CM; Sacks DB; Schmidt S; Schwaighofer SM; Sheng B; Simonson GD; Sode K; Spanakis EK; Spartano NL; Umpierrez GE; Vareth M; Vesper HW; Wang J; Wright E; Wu AHB; Yeshiwas S; Zilbermint M; Kohn MA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 Nov; 18(6):1346-1361. PubMed ID: 39369312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blood Gas Analyzer Accuracy of Glucose Measurements.
    Liang Y; Wanderer J; Nichols JH; Klonoff D; Rice MJ
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2017 Jul; 92(7):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 28645518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.
    Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of blood glucose meters in a New Zealand diabetes centre.
    Florkowski C; Budgen C; Kendall D; Lunt H; Moore MP
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2009 Jul; 46(Pt 4):302-5. PubMed ID: 19454540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Accuracy of blood glucose self-monitoring in children with type-I diabetes].
    Schwingshandl J; Borkenstein M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1993; 105(13):382-4. PubMed ID: 8351929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of the Enlite 6-day glucose sensor with guardian and Veo calibration algorithms.
    Keenan DB; Mastrototaro JJ; Zisser H; Cooper KA; Raghavendhar G; Lee SW; Yusi J; Bailey TS; Brazg RL; Shah RV
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Mar; 14(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22145851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a hybrid protocol using continuous glucose monitoring and point-of-care testing in non-critically ill patients in a community hospital.
    Baker M; Lauterwasser S; Valenti C; Kallenberger M; Stolte H
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2024 Apr; 81(9):e261-e267. PubMed ID: 38146957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of two updated blood glucose monitoring systems: an evaluation following ISO 15197:2013.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Jendrike N; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2016 May; 32(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 26809001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.