351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25563240)
1. Assessing the rhinoplasty outcome: inter-rater variability of aesthetic perception in the light of objective facial analysis.
Ozturk K; Gode S; Karahan C; Midilli R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 272(12):3709-13. PubMed ID: 25563240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aesthetic Motivation of Geriatric Rhinoplasty The Surgical Outcome.
Hong HR; Kim SH; Kim JH; Jang YJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1936-9. PubMed ID: 26147023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: evaluation by patients versus health professionals.
Byrne M; Chan JC; O'Broin E
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 24581635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying Septal Support Reconstructions for Saddle Nose Deformity: The Cakmak Algorithm.
Cakmak O; Emre IE; Ozkurt FE
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 26356747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction: patient versus panel perception.
Moolenburgh SE; Mureau MA; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Dec; 61(12):1459-64. PubMed ID: 18037361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Difference in Perception of Nasal Aesthetic Appearance Between Surgeons and Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center Perspective.
Kim CH; Kandathil CK; Saltychev M; Youn GM; Shah JP; Khan SI; Buba CM; Okland TS; Wei EX; Fullerton Z; Most SP
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Mar; 43(4):516-522. PubMed ID: 36478029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrepancy of the subjective perception of the nasal appearance between independent individuals and patients undergoing functional rhinoplasty (fRPL).
Heiming M; Savvas E; Rudack C; Stenner M; Spiekermann C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jan; 280(1):191-197. PubMed ID: 35763081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment outcomes of pediatric rhinoplasty: the Asan Medical Center experience.
Bae JS; Kim ES; Jang YJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1701-10. PubMed ID: 23958392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tension-relaxing method-A simplified revision of the endoscopic septoplasty technique: For both aesthetic appearance and functionality.
Zuo L; Jing S; Zhou C; Dai Z; Yang S; Sun B; Han Z; Chuang CC; Range EM; Wang F
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2015; 29(4):e105-11. PubMed ID: 26163238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective objective study of the cosmetic sequelae of nasal septal surgery.
Daudia A; Alkhaddour U; Sithole J; Mortimore S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 126(11):1201-5. PubMed ID: 17050314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a questionnaire assessing patient's aesthetic and functional outcome after nasal reconstruction: the patient NAFEQ-score.
Moolenburgh SE; Mureau MA; Duivenvoorden HJ; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 18262859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of patient's benefit from rhinoplasty.
Stewart EJ; Robinson K; Wilson JA
Rhinology; 1996 Mar; 34(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 8739874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.
Lohuis PJ; Faraj-Hakim S; Knobbe A; Duivesteijn W; Bran GM
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2012; 14(5):346-53. PubMed ID: 22986942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An analysis of 101 primary cosmetic rhinoplasties.
Bagheri SC; Khan HA; Jahangirnia A; Rad SS; Mortazavi H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):902-9. PubMed ID: 21684661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty.
Yu K; Kim A; Pearlman SJ
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2010; 12(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 20855769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The MiRa scale, a new standardised scale for evaluating nasal deformities before and after septorhinoplasty: A prospective study comparing patient satisfaction and the surgeon's assessment.
Radulesco T; Penicaud M; Santini L; Thomassin JM; Dessi P; Michel J
Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 42(6):1350-1357. PubMed ID: 28374943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-reported outcome measures in external and endonasal functional septorhinoplasty - A propensity score matching study.
Gostian M; Stange T; Wurm J; Gostian AO
Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102763. PubMed ID: 33152577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rhinoplasty-Do Patients and Surgeons See the Same? A Double-Blind Study with 100 Randomized Patients.
Ferreira MG; Santos M; Carmo DOE; Neves JC; Sousa CAE; Datema FR
Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Aug; 34(4):356-362. PubMed ID: 30041267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effectiveness of Skeletal Reconstruction in Severe Post-Rhinoplasty Nasal Deformity.
Sazgar AA; Hajialipour S; Razfar A; Rahavi-Ezabadi S
Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Jul; 41(8):905-918. PubMed ID: 33506865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome of Nasal Valve Obstruction After Functional and Aesthetic-Functional Rhinoplasty.
Yeung A; Hassouneh B; Kim DW
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016; 18(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 26660141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
