331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25563259)
41. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Multichannel response analysis on 2D projection views for detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Wei J; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Lu Y; Zhou C; Samala R
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041913. PubMed ID: 24694144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens.
Rößler AC; Kalender W; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Preuss C; Peter SC; Brehm B; Hammon M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 27888024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis.
Jia Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6643-53. PubMed ID: 22149846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Iterative image-domain decomposition for dual-energy CT.
Niu T; Dong X; Petrongolo M; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041901. PubMed ID: 24694132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A diffusion-based truncated projection artifact reduction method for iterative digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(3):569-87. PubMed ID: 23318346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.
Zhang X; Yuan J; Du S; Kripfgans OD; Wang X; Carson PL; Liu X
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061911. PubMed ID: 24877822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM?
Nelson JS; Wells JR; Baker JA; Samei E
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2538. PubMed ID: 27147364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Digital breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction using 2D and 3D total variation minimization.
Ertas M; Yildirim I; Kamasak M; Akan A
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Oct; 12():112. PubMed ID: 24172584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Model observer for assessing digital breast tomosynthesis for multi-lesion detection in the presence of anatomical noise.
Wen G; Markey MK; Haygood TM; Park S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045017. PubMed ID: 29376838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of the glandular composition on digital breast tomosynthesis image quality and dose optimisation.
Marques T; Ribeiro A; Di Maria S; Belchior A; Cardoso J; Matela N; Oliveira N; Janeiro L; Almeida P; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):337-41. PubMed ID: 25836692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images.
Vecchio S; Albanese A; Vignoli P; Taibi A
Eur Radiol; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1207-13. PubMed ID: 21193910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms.
Sidky EY; Pan X; Reiser IS; Nishikawa RM; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4920-32. PubMed ID: 19994501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Rose SD; Sanchez AA; Sidky EY; Pan X
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e279-e296. PubMed ID: 28901614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Variation in digital breast tomosynthesis image quality at differing heights above the detector.
Davidson R; Al Khalifah K; Zhou A
J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Jun; 69(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 34957671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Key technologies in digital breast tomosynthesis system:theory, design, and optimization].
Li M; Ma K; Tao X; Wang Y; He J; Wei Z; Chen G; Li S; Zeng D; Bian Z; Wu G; Liao S; Ma J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2019 Feb; 39(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 30890508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
