853 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25563271)
1. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
Samei E; Richard S
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction - a phantom study.
Dodge CT; Tamm EP; Cody DD; Liu X; Jensen CT; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):511-531. PubMed ID: 27074454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems. Part III. Task-based kV/mAs optimization for radiation dose reduction.
Li K; Gomez-Cardona D; Hsieh J; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5209-21. PubMed ID: 26328971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.
Li K; Garrett J; Ge Y; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071911. PubMed ID: 24989389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems: experimental assessment of noise performance.
Li K; Tang J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041906. PubMed ID: 24694137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A phantom study of the performance of model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose chest and abdominal CT: When are benefits maximized?
Moloney F; Twomey M; James K; Kavanagh RG; Fama D; O'Neill S; Grey TM; Moore N; Murphy MJ; O'Connor OJ; Maher MM
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 30292504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating iterative reconstruction performance in computed tomography.
Chen B; Ramirez Giraldo JC; Solomon J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121913. PubMed ID: 25471973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT iterative reconstruction algorithms: a task-based image quality assessment.
Greffier J; Frandon J; Larbi A; Beregi JP; Pereira F
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):487-500. PubMed ID: 31359122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Mise Y; Sumida K; Abe O
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
