176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25563274)
1. Novel tools for stepping source brachytherapy treatment planning: enhanced geometrical optimization and interactive inverse planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Koedooder K; Petra Kok H; van Wieringen N; Pieters BR; Bel A
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):348-53. PubMed ID: 25563274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Knowledge-based inverse treatment planning for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Guthier CV; Orio PF; Buzurovic I; Cormack RA
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2108-2117. PubMed ID: 33586191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control for rotating-shield brachytherapy.
Liu Y; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Wu X
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111709. PubMed ID: 25370623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of clinical benefits achievable by using different optimization algorithms during real-time prostate brachytherapy.
Adamczyk M; Zwierzchowski G; Malicki J; Skowronek J
Phys Med; 2013 Jan; 29(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 22221470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the impact of real-time multicriteria optimizers integrated with interactive plan navigation tools for HDR brachytherapy.
Bélanger C; Poulin É; Cui S; Vigneault É; Martin AG; Foster W; Després P; Cunha JAM; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):607-617. PubMed ID: 32713779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A gEUD-based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: feasibility study.
Giantsoudi D; Baltas D; Karabis A; Mavroidis P; Zamboglou N; Tselis N; Shi C; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041704. PubMed ID: 23556874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques.
Jacob D; Raben A; Sarkar A; Grimm J; Simpson L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 18455325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DVH-Based Inverse Planning Using Monte Carlo Dosimetry for LDR Prostate Brachytherapy.
Mountris KA; Visvikis D; Bert J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Feb; 103(2):503-510. PubMed ID: 30315873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urethra low-dose tunnels: validation of and class solution for generating urethra-sparing dose plans using inverse planning simulated annealing for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Cunha JA; Pouliot J; Weinberg V; Wang-Chesebro A; Roach M; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 21937284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-specific Monte Carlo-based dose-kernel approach for inverse planning in afterloading brachytherapy.
D'Amours M; Pouliot J; Dagnault A; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Dec; 81(5):1582-9. PubMed ID: 21075547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for optimization in real-time, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate.
Pokharel S; Rana S; Blikenstaff J; Sadeghi A; Prestidge B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4198. PubMed ID: 23835384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a Machine-Learning Algorithm for Treatment Planning in Prostate Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy.
Nicolae A; Morton G; Chung H; Loblaw A; Jain S; Mitchell D; Lu L; Helou J; Al-Hanaqta M; Heath E; Ravi A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Mar; 97(4):822-829. PubMed ID: 28244419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new optimization method using a compressed sensing inspired solver for real-time LDR-brachytherapy treatment planning.
Guthier C; Aschenbrenner KP; Buergy D; Ehmann M; Wenz F; Hesser JW
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2179-94. PubMed ID: 25683684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Anderson nomograms for permanent interstitial prostate implants: a briefing for practitioners.
Cohen GN; Amols HI; Zelefsky MJ; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):504-11. PubMed ID: 12023156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
