These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25563713)

  • 21. Orienting Attention to Auditory and Visual Short-term Memory: The Roles of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognitive Status.
    Garami L; Chow R; Fakuade A; Swaminathan S; Alain C
    Exp Aging Res; 2020; 46(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 31750789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Top-down modulation of alpha power and pattern similarity for threatening representations in visual short-term memory.
    Kuo BC; Li CH; Lin SH; Hu SH; Yeh YY
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():21-30. PubMed ID: 28887064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention.
    Delvenne JF; Cleeremans A; Laloyaux C
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 20178921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.
    Makovski T; Pertzov Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1735-43. PubMed ID: 25980784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the contribution of motor planning to the retroactive cuing benefit in working memory: Evidence by mu and beta oscillatory activity in the EEG.
    Schneider D; Barth A; Wascher E
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 162():73-85. PubMed ID: 28847491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Two distinct mechanisms of selection in working memory: Additive last-item and retro-cue benefits.
    Niklaus M; Singmann H; Oberauer K
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():282-302. PubMed ID: 30551034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The precision of spatial selection into the focus of attention in working memory.
    Souza AS; Thalmann M; Oberauer K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 29687399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retrospective cues based on object features improve visual working memory performance in older adults.
    Gilchrist AL; Duarte A; Verhaeghen P
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2016; 23(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 26208404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: advantage of peripheral over central cues.
    Han S; Zhou H; Tian Y; Ku Y
    Prog Neurobiol; 2023 Nov; 230():102521. PubMed ID: 37673370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Retro-Cue Benefit for Verbal Material and Its Influence on the Probability of Intrusions Under Dual-Task Conditions.
    Krefeld-Schwalb A
    Exp Psychol; 2018 May; 65(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 29905113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retro-cue effect: The retro-cue is effective when and only when working memory consolidation is inadequate.
    Luo T; Huang L; Tian M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Sep; 49(9):1439-1458. PubMed ID: 37023308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):731-758. PubMed ID: 34264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1839-60. PubMed ID: 27098647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A neural model of retrospective attention in visual working memory.
    Bays PM; Taylor R
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Feb; 100():43-52. PubMed ID: 29272732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account.
    Shepherdson P; Oberauer K; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):286-310. PubMed ID: 28557495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.