280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25564796)
1. Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures.
Salomao M; Gonda TA; Margolskee E; Eguia V; Remotti H; Poneros JM; Sethi A; Saqi A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25564796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polysomy and p16 deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.
Gonda TA; Glick MP; Sethi A; Poneros JM; Palmas W; Iqbal S; Gonzalez S; Nandula SV; Emond JC; Brown RS; Murty VV; Stevens PD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 22100297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study.
Fogel EL; deBellis M; McHenry L; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Cramer H; Schmidt S; Lazzell-Pannell L; Sherman S; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16377319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic yield and accuracy of a new cytology brush design compared to standard brush cytology for evaluation of biliary strictures.
Bank JS; Witt BL; Taylor LJ; Adler DG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Mar; 46(3):234-238. PubMed ID: 29230974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience.
Stoos-Veić T; Bilić B; Kaić G; Ostović KT; Babić Z; Kujundzić M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 20432742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of a stepwise cytological algorithm for biliary malignancy in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
von Seth E; Ouchterlony H; Dobra K; Hjerpe A; Arnelo U; Haas S; Bergquist A
Liver Int; 2019 Feb; 39(2):382-388. PubMed ID: 30507030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
Barr Fritcher EG; Voss JS; Brankley SM; Campion MB; Jenkins SM; Keeney ME; Henry MR; Kerr SM; Chaiteerakij R; Pestova EV; Clayton AC; Zhang J; Roberts LR; Gores GJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR
Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1813-1824.e1. PubMed ID: 26327129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in indeterminate biliary strictures.
Liew ZH; Loh TJ; Lim TKH; Lim TH; Khor CJL; Mesenas SJ; Kong CSC; Ong WC; Tan DMY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Jan; 33(1):315-319. PubMed ID: 28543841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures.
Farrell RJ; Jain AK; Brandwein SL; Wang H; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Nov; 54(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 11677474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Next-Generation Sequencing and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Have Comparable Performance Characteristics in the Analysis of Pancreaticobiliary Brushings for Malignancy.
Dudley JC; Zheng Z; McDonald T; Le LP; Dias-Santagata D; Borger D; Batten J; Vernovsky K; Sweeney B; Arpin RN; Brugge WR; Forcione DG; Pitman MB; Iafrate AJ
J Mol Diagn; 2016 Jan; 18(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 26596524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosing Biliary Malignancy.
Xu MM; Sethi A
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Oct; 25(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 26431597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multistep cytological approach for patients with jaundice and biliary strictures of indeterminate origin.
Boldorini R; Paganotti A; Andorno S; Orlando S; Mercalli F; Orsello M; Ballarè M; Magnani C; Sartori M
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25681513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mutation Profile and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analyses Increase Detection of Malignancies in Biliary Strictures.
Gonda TA; Viterbo D; Gausman V; Kipp C; Sethi A; Poneros JM; Gress F; Park T; Khan A; Jackson SA; Blauvelt M; Toney N; Finkelstein SD
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jun; 15(6):913-919.e1. PubMed ID: 28017843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of biliary brush cytology in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Lal A; Okonkwo A; Schindler S; De Frias D; Nayar R
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 14969174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology.
Aly FZ; Mostofizadeh S; Jawaid S; Knapik J; Mukhtar F; Klein R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 32770823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis and FISH for detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer in cytology specimens collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Kipp BR; Fritcher EG; Clayton AC; Gores GJ; Roberts LR; Zhang J; Levy MJ; Halling KC
J Mol Diagn; 2010 Nov; 12(6):780-6. PubMed ID: 20864634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Ryan ME; Baldauf MC
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):133-9. PubMed ID: 8013809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
