These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25567418)

  • 1. Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: the case of wheel rotations.
    Janczyk M; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW; Pfister R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):930-40. PubMed ID: 25567418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What or when? The impact of anticipated social action effects is driven by action-effect compatibility, not delay.
    Pfister R; Weller L; Dignath D; Kunde W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2132-2142. PubMed ID: 28688096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Through the portal: Effect anticipation in the central bottleneck.
    Wirth R; Pfister R; Janczyk M; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():141-51. PubMed ID: 26247333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?
    Müller R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):464-86. PubMed ID: 25957279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective rotations: action effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations.
    Janczyk M; Pfister R; Crognale MA; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Aug; 141(3):489-501. PubMed ID: 22268853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the representational basis of response-effect compatibility: Evidence from bilingual verbal response-effect mappings.
    Földes N; Philipp AM; Badets A; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():1-7. PubMed ID: 29631041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial compatibility effects with unimanual and bimanual wheel-rotation responses: an homage to guiard (1983).
    Murchison NM; Proctor RW
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):441-54. PubMed ID: 23972054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention.
    Yeh M; Wickens CD; Seagull FJ
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 10774124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceiving by proxy: effect-based action control with unperceivable effects.
    Pfister R; Pfeuffer CU; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 24853628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance.
    Janczyk M; Skirde S; Weigelt M; Kunde W
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Aug; 28(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 19395106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A diffusion model analysis of the response-effect compatibility effect.
    Janczyk M; Lerche V
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Feb; 148(2):237-251. PubMed ID: 29847981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action.
    Porcu E; Bölling L; Lappe M; Liepelt R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):972-7. PubMed ID: 27016344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From anticipation to integration: the role of integrated action-effects in building sensorimotor contingencies.
    Camus T; Hommel B; Brunel L; Brouillet T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1059-1065. PubMed ID: 28537007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticipatory affect during action preparation: evidence from backward compatibility in dual-task performance.
    Eder AB; Pfister R; Dignath D; Hommel B
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1211-1224. PubMed ID: 27414187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Action selection by temporally distal goal states.
    Janczyk M; Durst M; Ulrich R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):467-473. PubMed ID: 27325055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory-motor interference abolishes repetition priming for observed actions, but not for action-related verbs.
    Busiello M; Costantini M; Galati G; Committeri G
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Apr; 492(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 21281697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action effects are coded as transitions from current to future stimulation: Evidence from compatibility effects in tracking.
    Kunde W; Schmidts C; Wirth R; Herbort O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):477-486. PubMed ID: 27893272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory and motoric influences on attention dynamics during standing balance recovery in young and older adults.
    Redfern MS; Chambers AJ; Jennings JR; Furman JM
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2523-2531. PubMed ID: 28528460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A look into the future: Spontaneous anticipatory saccades reflect processes of anticipatory action control.
    Pfeuffer CU; Kiesel A; Huestegge L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Nov; 145(11):1530-1547. PubMed ID: 27797559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.