These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25567798)

  • 1. How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids.
    Fraser DJ
    Evol Appl; 2008 Nov; 1(4):535-86. PubMed ID: 25567798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term demographic and genetic effects of releasing captive-born individuals into the wild.
    Willoughby JR; Christie MR
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):377-388. PubMed ID: 30168872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population correlates of rapid captive-induced maladaptation in a wild fish.
    Fraser DJ; Walker L; Yates MC; Marin K; Wood JLA; Bernos TA; Zastavniouk C
    Evol Appl; 2019 Aug; 12(7):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 31417616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation.
    Christie MR; Marine ML; French RA; Blouin MS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jan; 109(1):238-42. PubMed ID: 22184236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inbreeding and selection shape genomic diversity in captive populations: Implications for the conservation of endangered species.
    Willoughby JR; Ivy JA; Lacy RC; Doyle JM; DeWoody JA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175996. PubMed ID: 28423000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians.
    Griffiths RA; Pavajeau L
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):852-61. PubMed ID: 18616746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal monitoring of neutral and adaptive genomic diversity in a reintroduction.
    Marshall IR; Brauer CJ; Wedderburn SD; Whiterod NS; Hammer MP; Barnes TC; Attard CRM; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):e13889. PubMed ID: 35023224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk assessment of inbreeding and outbreeding depression in a captive-breeding program.
    Rollinson N; Keith DM; Houde AL; Debes PV; McBride MC; Hutchings JA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):529-40. PubMed ID: 24476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Getting off to a good start? Genetic evaluation of the
    Valbuena-Ureña E; Soler-Membrives A; Steinfartz S; Alonso M; Carbonell F; Larios-Martín R; Obon E; Carranza S
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3447. PubMed ID: 28626615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs.
    Frankham R
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):325-33. PubMed ID: 18173504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel holistic framework for genetic-based captive-breeding and reintroduction programs.
    Attard CR; Möller LM; Sasaki M; Hammer MP; Bice CM; Brauer CJ; Carvalho DC; Harris JO; Beheregaray LB
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1060-9. PubMed ID: 26892747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fitness consequences of wildlife conservation translocations: a meta-analysis.
    Gross IP; Wilson AE; Wolak ME
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2024 Apr; 99(2):348-371. PubMed ID: 37844577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild.
    Araki H; Berejikian BA; Ford MJ; Blouin MS
    Evol Appl; 2008 May; 1(2):342-55. PubMed ID: 25567636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of managed gene flow in reducing genetic divergence associated with captive breeding.
    Waters CD; Hard JJ; Brieuc MS; Fast DE; Warheit KI; Waples RS; Knudsen CM; Bosch WJ; Naish KA
    Evol Appl; 2015 Dec; 8(10):956-71. PubMed ID: 26640521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs.
    Harding G; Griffiths RA; Pavajeau L
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):340-9. PubMed ID: 26306460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of stocking at the parr stage on the reproductive fitness and genetic diversity of a wild population of Atlantic salmon (
    Bouchard R; Wellband K; Lecomte L; Bernatchez L; April J
    Evol Appl; 2022 May; 15(5):838-852. PubMed ID: 35603030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic management on the brink of extinction: sequencing microsatellites does not improve estimates of inbreeding in wild and captive Vancouver Island marmots (
    Barrett KG; Amaral G; Elphinstone M; McAdie ML; Davis CS; Janes JK; Carnio J; Moehrenschlager A; Gorrell JC
    Conserv Genet; 2022; 23(2):417-428. PubMed ID: 35401067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pedigree analysis reveals a generational decline in reproductive success of captive Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii): implications for captive management of threatened species.
    Farquharson KA; Hogg CJ; Grueber CE
    J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):488-495. PubMed ID: 28379457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The guppy as a conservation model: implications of parasitism and inbreeding for reintroduction success.
    van Oosterhout C; Smith AM; Hänfling B; Ramnarine IW; Mohammed RS; Cable J
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1573-83. PubMed ID: 18173481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.