227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25567822)
1. Improving breast and colon cancer screening rates: a comparison of letters, automated phone calls, or both.
Phillips L; Hendren S; Humiston S; Winters P; Fiscella K
J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 25567822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Get screened: a randomized trial of the incremental benefits of reminders, recall, and outreach on cancer screening.
Fortuna RJ; Idris A; Winters P; Humiston SG; Scofield S; Hendren S; Ford P; Li SX; Fiscella K
J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Jan; 29(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 24002626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial.
Kiran T; Davie S; Moineddin R; Lofters A
J Am Board Fam Med; 2018; 31(6):857-868. PubMed ID: 30413542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice.
Hendren S; Winters P; Humiston S; Idris A; Li SX; Ford P; Specht R; Marcus S; Mendoza M; Fiscella K
J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Jan; 29(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 23818159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.
Baker DW; Brown T; Buchanan DR; Weil J; Balsley K; Ranalli L; Lee JY; Cameron KA; Ferreira MR; Stephens Q; Goldman SN; Rademaker A; Wolf MS
JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 174(8):1235-41. PubMed ID: 24934845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized controlled trial to improve colon cancer screening in rural family medicine: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) study.
Levy BT; Xu Y; Daly JM; Ely JW
J Am Board Fam Med; 2013; 26(5):486-97. PubMed ID: 24004700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colorectal cancer screening behavior in women attending screening mammography: longitudinal trends and predictors.
Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Abrahamse PH; Dong Q; Patterson SK; Bernstein SJ
Womens Health Issues; 2005; 15(6):249-57. PubMed ID: 16325138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does telephone contact with a physician's office staff improve mammogram screening rates?
Bodiya A; Vorias D; Dickson HA
Fam Med; 1999 May; 31(5):324-6. PubMed ID: 10407709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.
Green BB; Wang CY; Anderson ML; Chubak J; Meenan RT; Vernon SW; Fuller S
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Mar; 158(5 Pt 1):301-11. PubMed ID: 23460053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of translated reminder letters and phone calls on mammography screening booking rates: Two randomised controlled trials.
Beauchamp A; Mohebbi M; Cooper A; Pridmore V; Livingston P; Scanlon M; Davis M; O'Hara J; Osborne R
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226610. PubMed ID: 31923178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-visit-based cancer screening using a novel population management system.
Atlas SJ; Zai AH; Ashburner JM; Chang Y; Percac-Lima S; Levy DE; Chueh HC; Grant RW
J Am Board Fam Med; 2014; 27(4):474-85. PubMed ID: 25002002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening.
Lee JK; Groessl EJ; Ganiats TG; Ho SB
BMC Gastroenterol; 2011 Aug; 11():93. PubMed ID: 21867492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization.
Dietrich AJ; Tobin JN; Cassells A; Robinson CM; Reh M; Romero KA; Flood AB; Beach ML
Ann Fam Med; 2007; 5(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 17664498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.
Luckmann R; White MJ; Costanza ME; Frisard CF; Cranos C; Sama S; Yood R
Transl Behav Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):547-556. PubMed ID: 28452044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use.
Lairson DR; DiCarlo M; Myers RE; Wolf T; Cocroft J; Sifri R; Rosenthal M; Vernon SW; Wender R
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(4):779-88. PubMed ID: 18098272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial.
Coronado GD; Nyongesa DB; Escaron AL; Petrik AF; Thompson JH; Smith D; Davis MM; Schneider JL; Rivelli JS; Laguna T; Leo MC
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2023 Nov; 32(11):1608-1616. PubMed ID: 37566431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorectal cancer test use--Maryland, 2002-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2007 Sep; 56(36):932-6. PubMed ID: 17851446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice.
Meenan RT; Anderson ML; Chubak J; Vernon SW; Fuller S; Wang CY; Green BB
Am J Prev Med; 2015 Jun; 48(6):714-21. PubMed ID: 25998922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches.
Coronado GD; Rivelli JS; Fuoco MJ; Vollmer WM; Petrik AF; Keast E; Barker S; Topalanchik E; Jimenez R
J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jan; 33(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 29019046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
