These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2556908)
1. Three-dimensional gradient-recalled MR imaging as a screening tool for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Tsuruda JS; Norman D; Dillon W; Newton TH; Mills DG AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1989; 10(6):1263-71. PubMed ID: 2556908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional gradient-recalled MR imaging as a screening tool for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Tsuruda JS; Norman D; Dillon W; Newton TH; Mills DG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 2153331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short TR, variable flip angle, gradient echo scans of the cervical spine: comparison of 2DFT and 3DFT techniques. Enzmann D; Rubin JB Neuroradiology; 1989; 31(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 2779770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Degenerative narrowing of the cervical spine neural foramina: evaluation with high-resolution 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging. Yousem DM; Atlas SW; Goldberg HI; Grossman RI AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 1902018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging. Tsuruda JS; Remley K AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 1902019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-resolution 3DFT MR imaging of the endolymphatic duct and soft tissues of the otic capsule. Brogan M; Chakeres DW; Schmalbrock P AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 1899497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging? Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences. Meindl T; Wirth S; Weckbach S; Dietrich O; Reiser M; Schoenberg SO Eur Radiol; 2009 Mar; 19(3):713-21. PubMed ID: 18813933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI for identifying the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis in cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study. Douglas-Akinwande AC; Rydberg J; Shah MV; Phillips MD; Caldemeyer KS; Lurito JT; Ying J; Mathews VP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 20028905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D MRI of the cervical spine: low flip angle FISP vs. Gd-DTPA TurboFLASH in degenerative disk disease. Ross JS; Ruggieri PM; Glicklich M; Obuchowski N; Dillinger J; Masaryk TJ; Qu Y; Modic MT J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 8419435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography. Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical spine disk herniation: comparison of CT and 3DFT gradient echo MR scans. Yousem DM; Atlas SW; Hackney DB J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 1592913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intracranial lesion enhancement with gadolinium: T1-weighted spin-echo versus three-dimensional Fourier transform gradient-echo MR imaging. Mirowitz SA Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):529-34. PubMed ID: 1410367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine. Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences. Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]