766 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25569391)
1. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis.
Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Le Fort IV + I distraction osteogenesis using an internal device for syndromic craniosynostosis.
Sakamoto Y; Nakajima H; Tamada I; Sakamoto T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):788-95. PubMed ID: 24280175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis.
Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Hosaka Y
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1019-28. PubMed ID: 12621171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reossification of cranium and zygomatic arch after monobloc frontofacial distraction advancement for syndromic craniosynostosis.
Oyama A; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Renier D
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1905-9. PubMed ID: 19816373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis in syndromal craniosynostosis.
Meling TR; Hans-Erik H; Per S; Due-Tonnessen BJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 16432404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midface distraction osteogenesis: internal vs. external devices.
Meling TR; Høgevold HE; Due-Tønnessen BJ; Skjelbred P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21109402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an internal distraction device for syndromic craniosynostosis: device selection, problems, indications, and a proposal for use of a parallel bar for device-setting.
Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Tosa Y; Kadomatsu K
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 17119404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative outcomes and management in midface advancement surgery: a multicenter observational descriptive study from the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group.
Glover CD; Fernandez AM; Huang H; Derderian C; Binstock W; Reid R; Dalesio NM; Zhong J; Stricker PA;
Paediatr Anaesth; 2018 Aug; 28(8):710-718. PubMed ID: 29920872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alar Pinning in Rigid External Distraction for Midfacial Hypoplasia.
Yu JL; Woo AS
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Sep; 79(3):275-279. PubMed ID: 28570459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard?
Engel M; Berger M; Hoffmann J; Kühle R; Rückschloss T; Ristow O; Freudlsperger C; Kansy K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 30642732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The assessment of midface distraction osteogenesis in treatment of upper airway obstruction.
Xu H; Yu Z; Mu X
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1876-81. PubMed ID: 19816368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Le Fort III external midface distraction: surgical outcomes and skeletal stability.
Iannetti G; Ramieri V; Pagnoni M; Fadda MT; Cascone P
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):896-900. PubMed ID: 22565921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.
Mathijssen I; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Mireau E; Morisseau-Durand MP; Guérin P; Renier D
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 17(4):642-4. PubMed ID: 16877907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subcranial Midface Advancement in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Massenburg BB; Susarla SM; Kapadia HP; Hopper RA
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2022 Aug; 34(3):467-475. PubMed ID: 35787822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An internal distraction device for midface distraction osteogenesis: The NAVID system type Z'gok.
Sakamoto Y; Sakamoto T; Ishii T; Kishi K
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Feb; 73(2):351-356. PubMed ID: 31473118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-directional Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an individual prefabricated device.
Klammert U; Böhm H; Schweitzer T; Würzler K; Gbureck U; Reuther J; Kübler A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 37(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 19157890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Le Fort III osteotomy: to distract or not to distract?
Fearon JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(5):1091-103; discussion 1104-6. PubMed ID: 11373547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined push-pull distraction for correction of syndromic midfacial hypoplasia.
Schulten A; Lim AA; Bruun RA; Hayes C; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 64(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16360853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Follow-Up on Bone Stability and Complication Rate after Monobloc Advancement in Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Raposo-Amaral CE; Denadai R; Zanco GL; Ghizoni E; Raposo-Amaral CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 32221227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
