These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25569395)

  • 1. In vitro comparison of the effect of different slice thicknesses on the accuracy of linear measurements on cone beam computed tomography images in implant sites.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 25569395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Queiroz de Freitas D; Campos PS; Watanabe PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1364-8. PubMed ID: 25265127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
    Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements.
    Neves FS; Vasconcelos TV; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e155-8. PubMed ID: 23231370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible.
    Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA
    N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography.
    Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Borstlap WA; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):793-7. PubMed ID: 22469137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
    Park J; Cho HJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy.
    Nunes LS; Bornstein MM; Sendi P; Buser D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 23593627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contour changes in human alveolar bone following tooth extraction of the maxillary central incisor.
    Li B; Wang Y
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2014 Dec; 15(12):1064-71. PubMed ID: 25471836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 64-Detector-Multislice and Cone Beam Computed Tomographies in the Evaluation of Linear Measurements in the Alveolar Ridge.
    Pena de Andrade JG; Valerio CS; de Oliveira Monteiro MA; de Carvalho Machado V; Manzi FR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 26929949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study.
    Kapoor V; Kumar N; Dahiya K; Sikka R; Sirana P; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery.
    Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.