These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25569525)

  • 1. Point of view.
    Lurie JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):86. PubMed ID: 25569525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive spinal surgery and spinal stenosis.
    Arnold PM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 25635634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. X-Stop Resulted in a Higher Reoperation Rate Than Minimally Invasive Decompression, But Both Decreased Symptoms of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Huddleston P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(22):1889. PubMed ID: 26582619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Moojen WA; Peul WC
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1664. PubMed ID: 25832624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regarding: long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild for spinal stenosis.
    Tumialán LM; Marciano FF; Theodore N
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):252; author reply 252-3. PubMed ID: 22390527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Moojen WA; Van der Gaag NA
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):681-4. PubMed ID: 27659170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS TLIF.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 82(5):646-7. PubMed ID: 25153294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laminarthrectomy.
    Gunzburg R
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1993-4. PubMed ID: 19936802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term Results of Microendoscopic Muscle-preserving Interlaminar Decompression versus Spinal Process Splitting Laminectomy.
    Fukushi R; Yoshimoto M; Iesato N; Terashima Y; Takebayashi T; Yamashita T
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 79(6):511-517. PubMed ID: 29294509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Posterior Decompression Techniques Compared With Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis.
    Pich J
    Orthop Nurs; 2018; 37(5):318-319. PubMed ID: 30247416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regarding: Dr. Tumialán et al. in response to "Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild® for spinal stenosis".
    Benyamin RM; Vallejo R
    Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):498. PubMed ID: 22758601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar stenosis and disc herniation.
    Armin SS; Holly LT; Khoo LT
    Neurosurg Focus; 2008; 25(2):E11. PubMed ID: 18673040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.
    Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen Ø; Carlsen SM; Nygaard ØP; Gulati S
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1603. PubMed ID: 25833966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.
    Watanabe K; Matsumoto M; Ikegami T; Nishiwaki Y; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Ogawa Y; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 21142464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.