These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25569525)
1. Point of view. Lurie JD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):86. PubMed ID: 25569525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive spinal surgery and spinal stenosis. Arnold PM J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 25635634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. X-Stop Resulted in a Higher Reoperation Rate Than Minimally Invasive Decompression, But Both Decreased Symptoms of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Huddleston P J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(22):1889. PubMed ID: 26582619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates. Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD). Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]