These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Letter to the Editor concerning "A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle" by A. Colak et al. (2008) Eur Spine J;17:1745-51. Zhang H Eur Spine J; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1321-3. PubMed ID: 25822592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Lawrence MM; Hayek SM Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 26(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23963231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distraction laminoplasty for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. O'Leary PF; McCance SE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Mar; (384):26-34. PubMed ID: 11249174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression. Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Hue Zhang concerning "A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle" by A. Colak et al. (2008) Eur Spine J; 17:1745-1751. Şimşek H; Çolak A Eur Spine J; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1324-5. PubMed ID: 25822593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally invasive versus open laminotomy. Tan LA; Kasliwal MK; Fessler RG Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):1081-2. PubMed ID: 24851736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach. Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery. Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of minimally invasive decompression surgery on quality of life in older patients with spinal stenosis. Dagistan Y; Dagistan E; Gezici AR; Cancan SE; Bilgi M; Cakir U Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Dec; 139():86-90. PubMed ID: 26397214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Comparison of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach and Classic Laminectomy in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A retrospective Clinical Study. Yaman O; Ozdemir N; Dagli AT; Acar E; Dalbayrak S; Temiz C Turk Neurosurg; 2015; 25(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 26014006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How I do it? Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Choi CM; Chung JT; Lee SJ; Choi DJ Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Mar; 158(3):459-63. PubMed ID: 26782827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Problems faced by percutaneous spinal endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis]. Zhang SM Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2021 Jan; 34(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 33666012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Point of view: Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Sengupta DK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):450. PubMed ID: 16481956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]