These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25569607)

  • 1. Tactile warning signals for in-vehicle systems.
    Meng F; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Feb; 75():333-46. PubMed ID: 25569607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic vibrotactile signals for forward collision avoidance warning systems.
    Meng F; Gray R; Ho C; Ahtamad M; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):329-46. PubMed ID: 25850161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic vibrotactile warning signals for frontal collision avoidance: towards the torso versus towards the head.
    Meng F; Ho C; Gray R; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 25374255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():55-66. PubMed ID: 28189059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of different informative vibrotactile forward collision warnings: does the warning need to be linked to the collision event?
    Gray R; Ho C; Spence C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87070. PubMed ID: 24475225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual advisory warnings about hidden dangers: Effects of specific symbols and spatial referencing on necessary and unnecessary warnings.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():25-36. PubMed ID: 29885725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone.
    Mohebbi R; Gray R; Tan HZ
    Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 19634313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drivers' eye movements as a function of collision avoidance warning conditions in red light running scenarios.
    Zhang Y; Yan X; Li X; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():185-197. PubMed ID: 27543896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of collision warning characteristics on driving behaviors and safety in connected vehicle environments.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Huang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107053. PubMed ID: 37030178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 18074709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of Lateral Auditory Collision Warnings: Should Warnings Be Toward Danger or Toward Safety?
    Chen J; Šabić E; Mishler S; Parker C; Yamaguchi M
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):418-435. PubMed ID: 32779474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.