190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25569982)
1. Modeling transcranial electric stimulation in mouse: a high resolution finite element study.
Bernabei JM; Lee WH; Peterchev AV
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():406-9. PubMed ID: 25569982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.
Lee WH; Deng ZD; Kim TS; Laine AF; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2110-23. PubMed ID: 22032945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of electric field strength and spatial distribution of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in a realistic human head model.
Lee WH; Lisanby SH; Laine AF; Peterchev AV
Eur Psychiatry; 2016 Aug; 36():55-64. PubMed ID: 27318858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical variability predicts individual differences in transcranial electric stimulation motor threshold.
Lee WH; Lisanby SH; Laine AF; Peterchev AV
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():815-8. PubMed ID: 24109812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.
Lee WH; Lisanby SH; Laine AF; Peterchev AV
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Sep; 62(9):2095-105. PubMed ID: 25910001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy.
Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
J ECT; 2013 Dec; 29(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 24263276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stimulation strength and focality of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in a realistic head model.
Lee WH; Lisanby SH; Laine AF; Peterchev AV
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():410-3. PubMed ID: 25569983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation.
Bai S; Loo C; Dokos S
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 41(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 23510007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling transcranial electrical stimulation in the aging brain.
Indahlastari A; Albizu A; O'Shea A; Forbes MA; Nissim NR; Kraft JN; Evangelista ND; Hausman HK; Woods AJ;
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):664-674. PubMed ID: 32289695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human.
Alekseichuk I; Mantell K; Shirinpour S; Opitz A
Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():136-148. PubMed ID: 30910725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.
Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.
Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Sadleir RJ
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026019. PubMed ID: 30605892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the electric field in the brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: A sensitivity analysis.
Santos L; Martinho M; Salvador R; Wenger C; Fernandes SR; Ripolles O; Ruffini G; Miranda PC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1778-1781. PubMed ID: 28268672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptive current-flow models of ECT: Explaining individual static impedance, dynamic impedance, and brain current density.
Unal G; Swami JK; Canela C; Cohen SL; Khadka N; FallahRad M; Short B; Argyelan M; Sackeim HA; Bikson M
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(5):1154-1168. PubMed ID: 34332156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relation between the electric field and activation of cortical neurons in transcranial electrical stimulation.
Seo H; Jun SC
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(2):275-289. PubMed ID: 30449635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation.
Opitz A; Yeagle E; Thielscher A; Schroeder C; Mehta AD; Milham MP
Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():560-567. PubMed ID: 30010008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS.
Saturnino GB; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():25-35. PubMed ID: 26142274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
