These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Surplus value of implanted peroneal functional electrical stimulation over ankle-foot orthosis for gait adaptability in people with foot drop after stroke. Berenpas F; Geurts AC; den Boer J; van Swigchem R; Nollet F; Weerdesteyn V Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():157-162. PubMed ID: 31071538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Functional electrical stimulation on improving foot drop gait in poststroke rehabilitation: a review of its technology and clinical efficacy. Sabut SK; Bhattacharya SD; Manjunatha M Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 41(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 24580568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Recovery of coordinated gait: randomized controlled stroke trial of functional electrical stimulation (FES) versus no FES, with weight-supported treadmill and over-ground training. Daly JJ; Zimbelman J; Roenigk KL; McCabe JP; Rogers JM; Butler K; Burdsall R; Holcomb JP; Marsolais EB; Ruff RL Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2011 Sep; 25(7):588-96. PubMed ID: 21515871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Functional electrical stimulation versus ankle foot orthoses for foot-drop: A meta-analysis of orthotic effects. Prenton S; Hollands KL; Kenney LP J Rehabil Med; 2016 Oct; 48(8):646-656. PubMed ID: 27563700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Brain-Computer Interface Training With Functional Electrical Stimulation: Facilitating Changes in Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity and Motor Outcomes Post-stroke. Sinha AM; Nair VA; Prabhakaran V Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():670953. PubMed ID: 34646112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Bethoux F; Rogers HL; Nolan KJ; Abrams GM; Annaswamy TM; Brandstater M; Browne B; Burnfield JM; Feng W; Freed MJ; Geis C; Greenberg J; Gudesblatt M; Ikramuddin F; Jayaraman A; Kautz SA; Lutsep HL; Madhavan S; Meilahn J; Pease WS; Rao N; Seetharama S; Sethi P; Turk MA; Wallis RA; Kufta C Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Sep; 28(7):688-97. PubMed ID: 24526708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Brain-computer interface driven functional electrical stimulation system for overground walking in spinal cord injury participant. King CE; Wang PT; McCrimmon CM; Chou CC; Do AH; Nenadic Z Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():1238-42. PubMed ID: 25570189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. User experiences, preferences and choices relating to functional electrical stimulation and ankle foot orthoses for foot-drop after stroke. Bulley C; Shiels J; Wilkie K; Salisbury L Physiotherapy; 2011 Sep; 97(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 21820541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Brain-computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery. Pichiorri F; Morone G; Petti M; Toppi J; Pisotta I; Molinari M; Paolucci S; Inghilleri M; Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D Ann Neurol; 2015 May; 77(5):851-65. PubMed ID: 25712802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke. Bethoux F; Rogers HL; Nolan KJ; Abrams GM; Annaswamy T; Brandstater M; Browne B; Burnfield JM; Feng W; Freed MJ; Geis C; Greenberg J; Gudesblatt M; Ikramuddin F; Jayaraman A; Kautz SA; Lutsep HL; Madhavan S; Meilahn J; Pease WS; Rao N; Seetharama S; Sethi P; Turk MA; Wallis RA; Kufta C Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2015; 29(10):911-22. PubMed ID: 25653225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effects of brain-computer interface-based functional electrical stimulation on balance and gait function in patients with stroke: preliminary results. Chung E; Park SI; Jang YY; Lee BH J Phys Ther Sci; 2015 Feb; 27(2):513-6. PubMed ID: 25729205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. BCI Monitor Enhances Electroencephalographic and Cerebral Hemodynamic Activations During Motor Training. Wang Z; Zhou Y; Chen L; Gu B; Yi W; Liu S; Xu M; Qi H; He F; Ming D IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Apr; 27(4):780-787. PubMed ID: 30843846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of mirror therapy combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on motor recovery of lower limbs and walking ability of patients with stroke: a randomized controlled study. Xu Q; Guo F; Salem HMA; Chen H; Huang X Clin Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1583-1591. PubMed ID: 28459163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cortical activation pattern for grasping during observation, imagery, execution, FES, and observation-FES integrated BCI: an fNIRS pilot study. An J; Jin SH; Lee SH; Jang G; Abibullaev B; Lee H; Moon JI Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6345-8. PubMed ID: 24111192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device: a randomized clinical trial. Barker RN; Brauer SG; Carson RG Stroke; 2008 Jun; 39(6):1800-7. PubMed ID: 18403742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Functional electrical stimulation based on a pelvis support robot for gait rehabilitation of hemiplegic patients after stroke. Ye J; Nakashima Y; Zhang B; Kobayashi Y; Fujie MG Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():3098-101. PubMed ID: 25570646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Brain-computer interfaces in the completely locked-in state and chronic stroke. Chaudhary U; Birbaumer N; Ramos-Murguialday A Prog Brain Res; 2016; 228():131-61. PubMed ID: 27590968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]