These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. Electrical stimulation accelerates nerve regeneration and functional recovery in delayed peripheral nerve injury in rats. Huang J; Zhang Y; Lu L; Hu X; Luo Z Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 38(12):3691-701. PubMed ID: 24118464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reduced Heat Generation During Magnetic Stimulation of Rat Sciatic Nerve Using Current Waveform Truncation. Kagan ZB; Mize JT; Kosta P; Lazzi G; Normann RA; Warren DJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 May; 27(5):937-946. PubMed ID: 30990431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A strong constant magnetic field affects muscle tension development in bullfrog neuromuscular preparations. Satow Y; Matsunami K; Kawashima T; Satake H; Huda K Bioelectromagnetics; 2001 Jan; 22(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 11122493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stimulation of regeneration of the rat sciatic nerve by 50 Hz sinusoidal magnetic fields. Rusovan A; Kanje M Exp Neurol; 1991 Jun; 112(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2029930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electrophysiologic evidence for an intersegmental reflex pathway between lumbar paraspinal tissues. Kang YM; Choi WS; Pickar JG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Feb; 27(3):E56-63. PubMed ID: 11805709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Delaying discharge after the stimulus significantly decreases muscle activation thresholds with small impact on the selectivity: an in vivo study using TIME. Maciejasz P; Badia J; Boretius T; Andreu D; Stieglitz T; Jensen W; Navarro X; Guiraud D Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Apr; 53(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 25652078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Counted cycles method to quantify the onset response in high-frequency peripheral nerve block. Foldes EL; Ackermann D; Bhadra N; Kilgore KL Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():614-7. PubMed ID: 19963719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of electrical nerve stimulation, electrical muscle stimulation and magnetic nerve stimulation to assess the neuromuscular function of the plantar flexor muscles. Neyroud D; Temesi J; Millet GY; Verges S; Maffiuletti NA; Kayser B; Place N Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 Jul; 115(7):1429-39. PubMed ID: 25682322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative analysis of muscle hardness in tetanic contractions induced by electrical stimulation in rats. Morisada M; Okada K; Kawakita K Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Aug; 97(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 16770569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effectiveness of electrical stimulation on nerve regeneration after crush injury: Comparison between invasive and non-invasive stimulation. Ju C; Park E; Kim T; Kim T; Kang M; Lee KS; Park SM PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233531. PubMed ID: 32453807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrical stimulation impairs early functional recovery and accentuates skeletal muscle atrophy after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats. Gigo-Benato D; Russo TL; Geuna S; Domingues NR; Salvini TF; Parizotto NA Muscle Nerve; 2010 May; 41(5):685-93. PubMed ID: 20405500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Short-term electrical stimulation to promote nerve repair and functional recovery in a rat model. Calvey C; Zhou W; Stakleff KS; Sendelbach-Sloan P; Harkins AB; Lanzinger W; Willits RK J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 40(2):314-22. PubMed ID: 25459379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]