These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25570749)

  • 41. Brain-Machine Interface control of a robot arm using actor-critic rainforcement learning.
    Pohlmeyer EA; Mahmoudi B; Geng S; Prins N; Sanchez JC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4108-11. PubMed ID: 23366831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation.
    Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 May; 20(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 22623406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intrinsic interactive reinforcement learning - Using error-related potentials for real world human-robot interaction.
    Kim SK; Kirchner EA; Stefes A; Kirchner F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17562. PubMed ID: 29242555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Strangeness-driven exploration in multi-agent reinforcement learning.
    Kim JB; Choi HB; Han YH
    Neural Netw; 2024 Apr; 172():106149. PubMed ID: 38306786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Exploring Feature Dimensions to Learn a New Policy in an Uninformed Reinforcement Learning Task.
    Choung OH; Lee SW; Jeong Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17676. PubMed ID: 29247192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Exploration in neo-Hebbian reinforcement learning: Computational approaches to the exploration-exploitation balance with bio-inspired neural networks.
    Triche A; Maida AS; Kumar A
    Neural Netw; 2022 Jul; 151():16-33. PubMed ID: 35367735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Tracking Control Based on Inverse Optimal Control.
    Xue W; Kolaric P; Fan J; Lian B; Chai T; Lewis FL
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2022 Oct; 52(10):10570-10581. PubMed ID: 33877993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inertia-Constrained Reinforcement Learning to Enhance Human Motor Control Modeling.
    Korivand S; Jalili N; Gong J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 36904901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Somatosensory working memory in human reinforcement-based motor learning.
    Sidarta A; van Vugt FT; Ostry DJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):3275-3286. PubMed ID: 30354856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reinforcement-based processes actively regulate motor exploration along redundant solution manifolds.
    Roth AM; Calalo JA; Lokesh R; Sullivan SR; Grill S; Jeka JJ; van der Kooij K; Carter MJ; Cashaback JGA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Oct; 290(2009):20231475. PubMed ID: 37848061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reduced Effort Does Not Imply Slacking: Responsiveness to Error Increases With Robotic Assistance.
    Takagi A; Kambara H; Koike Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Jul; 26(7):1363-1370. PubMed ID: 29985145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Adaptive Discount Factor for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Continuing Tasks with Uncertainty.
    Kim M; Kim JS; Choi MS; Park JH
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Increased reward in ankle robotics training enhances motor control and cortical efficiency in stroke.
    Goodman RN; Rietschel JC; Roy A; Jung BC; Diaz J; Macko RF; Forrester LW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(2):213-27. PubMed ID: 24933720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Credit Assignment in a Motor Decision Making Task Is Influenced by Agency and Not Sensory Prediction Errors.
    Parvin DE; McDougle SD; Taylor JA; Ivry RB
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(19):4521-4530. PubMed ID: 29650698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effective reinforcement learning following cerebellar damage requires a balance between exploration and motor noise.
    Therrien AS; Wolpert DM; Bastian AJ
    Brain; 2016 Jan; 139(Pt 1):101-14. PubMed ID: 26626368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Learning efficient haptic shape exploration with a rigid tactile sensor array.
    Fleer S; Moringen A; Klatzky RL; Ritter H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226880. PubMed ID: 31896135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Coadaptive brain-machine interface via reinforcement learning.
    DiGiovanna J; Mahmoudi B; Fortes J; Principe JC; Sanchez JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jan; 56(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 19224719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reinforcement learning and its connections with neuroscience and psychology.
    Subramanian A; Chitlangia S; Baths V
    Neural Netw; 2022 Jan; 145():271-287. PubMed ID: 34781215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A dynamic approach to support outbreak management using reinforcement learning and semi-connected SEIQR models.
    Kao Y; Chu PJ; Chou PC; Chen CC
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):751. PubMed ID: 38462635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Confirmatory reinforcement learning changes with age during adolescence.
    Chierchia G; Soukupová M; Kilford EJ; Griffin C; Leung J; Palminteri S; Blakemore SJ
    Dev Sci; 2023 May; 26(3):e13330. PubMed ID: 36194156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.