BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25570945)

  • 1. Modelling of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation: different coil configurations.
    Guadagnin V; Parazzini M; Liorni I; Fiocchi S; Ravazzani P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():4306-9. PubMed ID: 25570945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Modeling of Different Coil Configurations.
    Guadagnin V; Parazzini M; Fiocchi S; Liorni I; Ravazzani P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jul; 63(7):1543-50. PubMed ID: 26560868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.
    Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jan; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 22483681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Lu M; Ueno S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178422. PubMed ID: 28586349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational Study Toward Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Using Coaxial Circular Coils.
    Lu M; Ueno S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2911-9. PubMed ID: 26151931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Improved Coil Design and Assessment of the Induced Fields Using MIDA Model.
    Samoudi AM; Tanghe E; Martens L; Joseph W
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():7061420. PubMed ID: 29967781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High permeability cores to optimize the stimulation of deeply located brain regions using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Salvador R; Miranda PC; Roth Y; Zangen A
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(10):3113-28. PubMed ID: 19420425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation and transcranial pulsed current stimulation: a computer based high-resolution modeling study.
    Datta A; Dmochowski JP; Guleyupoglu B; Bikson M; Fregni F
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():280-7. PubMed ID: 23041337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive Survey on Improved Focality and Penetration Depth of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Employing Multi-Coil Arrays.
    Wei X; Li Y; Lu M; Wang J; Yi G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Nov; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 29135963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.
    Gomez LJ; Goetz SM; Peterchev AV
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):046033. PubMed ID: 29855433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coil design considerations for deep-brain transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS).
    Deng ZD; Peterchev AV; Lisanby SH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5675-9. PubMed ID: 19164005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary on: Deng et al., Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.
    Roth Y; Pell GS; Zangen A
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jan; 6(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 22560047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of magnetic field distributions generated by various permanent magnets for transcranial static magnetic stimulation: A simulation study.
    Park J; Lee C; Lee S; Im CH
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Nov; 114():103476. PubMed ID: 31585401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation method for in situ electric field in standardized human brain for different transcranial magnetic stimulation coils.
    Iwahashi M; Gomez-Tames J; Laakso I; Hirata A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2224-2238. PubMed ID: 28222046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcranial direct current stimulation: estimation of the electric field and of the current density in an anatomical human head model.
    Parazzini M; Fiocchi S; Rossi E; Paglialonga A; Ravazzani P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1773-80. PubMed ID: 21335303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved field localization in transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain with the utilization of a conductive shield plate in the stimulator.
    Kim DH; Georghiou GE; Won C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):720-5. PubMed ID: 16602579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jun; 125(6):1202-12. PubMed ID: 24411523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional distribution of the electric field induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation using figure-8 and deep H-coils.
    Roth Y; Amir A; Levkovitz Y; Zangen A
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 24(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17277575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.
    Datta A; Elwassif M; Battaglia F; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2008 Jun; 5(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 18441418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.