These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25571454)

  • 1. Low dimensional manifold embedding for scattering coefficients of intrapartum fetale heart rate variability.
    Chudacek V; Talmon R; Anden J; Mallat S; Coifman RR; Abry P; Doret M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6373-6. PubMed ID: 25571454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scattering transform for intrapartum fetal heart rate variability fractal analysis: a case-control study.
    Chudáček V; Andén J; Mallat S; Abry P; Doret M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1100-8. PubMed ID: 24658235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nearest-neighbor based wavelet entropy rate measures for intrapartum fetal heart rate variability.
    Spilka J; Roux SG; Garnier NB; Abry P; Goncalves P; Doret M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2813-6. PubMed ID: 25570576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scattering transform for intrapartum fetal heart rate characterization and acidosis detection.
    Chudáček V; Andén J; Mallat S; Abry P; Doret M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2898-901. PubMed ID: 24110333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sparse Support Vector Machine for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Classification.
    Spilka J; Frecon J; Leonarduzzi R; Pustelnik N; Abry P; Doret M
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 May; 21(3):664-671. PubMed ID: 27046884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marked fetal acidosis and specific changes in power spectrum analysis of fetal heart rate variability recorded during the last hour of labour.
    Siira SM; Ojala TH; Vahlberg TJ; Jalonen JO; Välimäki IA; Rosén KG; Ekholm EM
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):418-23. PubMed ID: 15777438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrapartum fetal heart rate classification from trajectory in Sparse SVM feature space.
    Spilka J; Frecon J; Leonarduzzi R; Pustelnik N; Abry P; Doret M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():2335-8. PubMed ID: 26736761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutual information for intrapartum fetal heart rate analysis.
    Granero-Belinchon C; Roux SG; Garnier NB; Abry P; Doret M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2014-2017. PubMed ID: 29060291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fractal Analysis and Hurst Parameter for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Variability Analysis: A Versatile Alternative to Frequency Bands and LF/HF Ratio.
    Doret M; Spilka J; Chudáček V; Gonçalves P; Abry P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136661. PubMed ID: 26322889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variation in postterm pregnancy: prediction of intrapartum fetal distress and fetal acidosis.
    Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Schulman H; Kellner L; Plancher S; Maulik D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1132-8. PubMed ID: 7943086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R; Crane J; Hamilton E; Hughes O; Kuling S; MacKinnon C; McNamara H; Milne K; Richardson B; Trépanie MJ; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. PubMed ID: 12196876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is intrapartum vibroacoustic stimulation an effective predictor of fetal acidosis?
    Lin CC; Vassallo B; Mittendorf R
    J Perinat Med; 2001; 29(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 11776681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings in patients with neonatal seizures vs. no seizures: what are the differences?
    Williams KP; Galerneau F
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(5):422-5. PubMed ID: 15493719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
    Pinas A; Chandraharan E
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive multiscale complexity analysis of fetal heart rate.
    Helgason H; Abry P; Gonçalvès P; Gharib C; Gaucherand P; Doret M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Aug; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 21382764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multifractal analysis of fetal heart rate variability in fetuses with and without severe acidosis during labor.
    Doret M; Helgason H; Abry P; Goncalves P; Gharib C; Gaucherand P
    Am J Perinatol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 21089007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different types of variable decelerations and their effects to neonatal outcome.
    Kazandi M; Sendag F; Akercan F; Terek MC; Gundem G
    Singapore Med J; 2003 May; 44(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 13677360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.