138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25571533)
1. Validation of computational fluid dynamics methods with anatomically exact, 3D printed MRI phantoms and 4D pcMRI.
Anderson JR; Diaz O; Klucznik R; Zhang YJ; Britz GW; Grossman RG; Lv N; Huang Q; Karmonik C
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6699-701. PubMed ID: 25571533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Four-Dimensional Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol Optimization Using Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Printed Replicas for In Vivo Imaging Before and After Flow Diverter Placement.
Karmonik C; Anderson JR; Elias S; Klucznik R; Diaz O; Zhang YJ; Grossman RG; Britz GW
World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():775-782. PubMed ID: 28624566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics--preliminary experience.
Karmonik C; Klucznik R; Benndorf G
Rofo; 2008 Mar; 180(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 18278729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D phase contrast MRI in models of human airways: Validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of steady inspiratory flow.
Collier GJ; Kim M; Chung Y; Wild JM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1400-1409. PubMed ID: 29630757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cerebral blood flow in a healthy Circle of Willis and two intracranial aneurysms: computational fluid dynamics versus four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
Berg P; Stucht D; Janiga G; Beuing O; Speck O; Thévenin D
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24292415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of the discrepancies between four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and in-silico simulations of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics.
Heidari Pahlavian S; Bunck AC; Loth F; Shane Tubbs R; Yiallourou T; Kroeger JR; Heindel W; Martin BA
J Biomech Eng; 2015 May; 137(5):051002. PubMed ID: 25647090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional printing of anatomically accurate, patient specific intracranial aneurysm models.
Anderson JR; Thompson WL; Alkattan AK; Diaz O; Klucznik R; Zhang YJ; Britz GW; Grossman RG; Karmonik C
J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 May; 8(5):517-20. PubMed ID: 25862767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancement of cerebrovascular 4D flow MRI velocity fields using machine learning and computational fluid dynamics simulation data.
Rutkowski DR; Roldán-Alzate A; Johnson KM
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10240. PubMed ID: 33986368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Merging computational fluid dynamics and 4D Flow MRI using proper orthogonal decomposition and ridge regression.
Bakhshinejad A; Baghaie A; Vali A; Saloner D; Rayz VL; D'Souza RM
J Biomech; 2017 Jun; 58():162-173. PubMed ID: 28577904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI.
Rispoli VC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS; Carvalho JL
Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Nov; 14():110. PubMed ID: 26611470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI.
Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Denoising and spatial resolution enhancement of 4D flow MRI using proper orthogonal decomposition and lasso regularization.
Fathi MF; Bakhshinejad A; Baghaie A; Saloner D; Sacho RH; Rayz VL; D'Souza RM
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():165-172. PubMed ID: 30423501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates.
Karmonik C; Yen C; Grossman RG; Klucznik R; Benndorf G
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 May; 151(5):479-85; discussion 485. PubMed ID: 19343271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D MR flow analysis in realistic rapid-prototyping model systems of the thoracic aorta: comparison with in vivo data and computational fluid dynamics in identical vessel geometries.
Canstein C; Cachot P; Faust A; Stalder AF; Bock J; Frydrychowicz A; Küffer J; Hennig J; Markl M
Magn Reson Med; 2008 Mar; 59(3):535-46. PubMed ID: 18306406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms--comparison with computed fluid dynamics.
Naito T; Miyachi S; Matsubara N; Isoda H; Izumi T; Haraguchi K; Takahashi I; Ishii K; Wakabayashi T
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jun; 154(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 22392013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics.
Kweon J; Yang DH; Kim GB; Kim N; Paek M; Stalder AF; Greiser A; Kim YH
Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3588-97. PubMed ID: 26747263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemodynamics in a three-dimensional printed aortic model: a comparison of four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance and image-based computational fluid dynamics.
Park J; Kim J; Hyun S; Lee J
MAGMA; 2022 Oct; 35(5):719-732. PubMed ID: 35133539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
