283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25571688)
1. In vitro and clinical outcome of sandwich restorations with a bulk-fill flowable composite liner for pulpotomized primary teeth.
Cantekin K; Gumus H
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 25571688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns.
Sonmez D; Duruturk L
Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):E18; discussion 408-9. PubMed ID: 20448584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month Follow-up.
Rosenberg L; Atar M; Daronch M; Honig A; Chey M; Funny MD; Cruz L
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23635886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3-year randomised controlled trial.
Huth KC; Hajek-Al-Khatar N; Wolf P; Ilie N; Hickel R; Paschos E
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1243-50. PubMed ID: 21842145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MTA pulpotomy as an alternative to root canal treatment in children's permanent teeth in a dental public health setting.
Alqaderi HE; Al-Mutawa SA; Qudeimat MA
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1390-5. PubMed ID: 24973732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: a randomised controlled trial.
Sakai VT; Moretti AB; Oliveira TM; Fornetti AP; Santos CF; Machado MA; Abdo RC
Br Dent J; 2009 Aug; 207(3):E5; discussion 128-9. PubMed ID: 19629145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pulp exposure occurrence and outcomes after 1- or 2-visit indirect pulp therapy vs complete caries removal in primary and permanent molars.
Orhan AI; Oz FT; Orhan K
Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 20836956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
Atieh M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy in primary molars.
Liu H; Zhou Q; Qin M
Chin J Dent Res; 2011; 14(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 22319753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars.
Guelmann M; Bookmyer KL; Villalta P; García-Godoy F
J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 15871455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials.
Guelmann M; McIlwain MF; Primosch RE
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 15839391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars.
Guelmann M; Fair J; Bimstein E
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):478-81. PubMed ID: 16532888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up.
Yildirim C; Basak F; Akgun OM; Polat GG; Altun C
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26696101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective record review: reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy: a retrospective study.
Hui-Derksen EK; Chen CF; Majewski R; Tootla RG; Boynton JR
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 23635897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.
Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Rezvani G; Rahimi M
Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):501-4. PubMed ID: 22353410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
