These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25571820)
1. Summary of: repair vs replacement of failed restorations in general dental practice: factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes. Blum IR Br Dent J; 2015 Jan; 218(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 25571820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repair vs replacement of failed restorations in general dental practice: factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes. Javidi H; Tickle M; Aggarwal VR Br Dent J; 2015 Jan; 218(1):E2. PubMed ID: 25571840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study. Casagrande L; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():30-36. PubMed ID: 28602850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Mjör IA Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 9083578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 22771415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Fernández EM; Martin JA; Angel PA; Mjör IA; Gordan VV; Moncada GA Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 21537587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN. Gordan VV; Riley JL; Worley DC; Gilbert GH; J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 22342563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK. Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Cheung SW; Mjör IA Br Dent J; 2002 Jun; 192(12):699-702. PubMed ID: 12125795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings. Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Mjör IA; Dahl JE; Moorhead JE Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Jan; 60(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 11902609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits. Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries. Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort. Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the management and teaching of dental restoration repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys. Kanzow P; Wiegand A; Göstemeyer G; Schwendicke F J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():1-21. PubMed ID: 28943362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. McCracken MS; Gordan VV; Litaker MS; Funkhouser E; Fellows JL; Shamp DG; Qvist V; Meral JS; Gilbert GH; J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Jun; 144(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 23729455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations. Eltahlah D; Lynch CD; Chadwick BL; Blum IR; Wilson NHF J Dent; 2018 May; 72():1-7. PubMed ID: 29522787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]