These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25571915)

  • 1. The potential use of ultra-low radiation dose images in digital mammography--a clinical proof-of-concept study in craniocaudal views.
    Bluekens AM; Veldkamp WJ; Schuur KH; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140626. PubMed ID: 25571915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of breast arterial calcium mass quantification using digital mammography.
    Molloi S; Mehraien T; Iribarren C; Smith C; Ducote JL; Feig SA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 19201356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
    Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.
    Cole EB; Toledano AY; Lundqvist M; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22. PubMed ID: 22537503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.
    Gupta S; Markey MK
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are All Views with and without Displacement Maneuver Necessary in Augmentation Mammography? Putting Numbers Into Perspective.
    Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Corrêa RS; Lauar MV; Bauab SP; Urban LABD; Cruvinel-Filho JLO; Soares LR; Savaris RF
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jan; 23(1):233-239. PubMed ID: 35092393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
    Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
    Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of GE digital breast tomosynthesis vs supplementary mammographic views for diagnosis of screen-detected soft-tissue breast lesions.
    Cornford EJ; Turnbull AE; James JJ; Tsang R; Akram T; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Tennant SL; Bagnall MJ; Puri S; Ball GR; Chen Y; Jones V
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150735. PubMed ID: 26559441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms.
    Hakim CM; Catullo VJ; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Kelly AE; Shinde DD; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Bandos AI; Gur D
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25768673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction.
    Endo T; Morita T; Oiwa M; Suda N; Sato Y; Ichihara S; Shiraiwa M; Yoshikawa K; Horiba T; Ogawa H; Hayashi Y; Sendai T; Arai T
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28956298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma].
    Ding JH; Peng WJ; Jiang ZX; Xu LH; Hu DT; Zheng XJ
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 31(11):854-7. PubMed ID: 20137352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.