BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25571922)

  • 1. Non-invasive wave reflection quantification in patients with reduced ejection fraction.
    Parragh S; Hametner B; Bachler M; Weber T; Eber B; Wassertheurer S
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Feb; 36(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 25571922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wave reflection quantification based on pressure waveforms alone--methods, comparison, and clinical covariates.
    Hametner B; Wassertheurer S; Kropf J; Mayer C; Holzinger A; Eber B; Weber T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Mar; 109(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 23107159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determinants and covariates of central pressures and wave reflections in systolic heart failure.
    Parragh S; Hametner B; Bachler M; Kellermair J; Eber B; Wassertheurer S; Weber T
    Int J Cardiol; 2015; 190():308-14. PubMed ID: 25935618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational assessment of model-based wave separation using a database of virtual subjects.
    Hametner B; Schneider M; Parragh S; Wassertheurer S
    J Biomech; 2017 Nov; 64():26-31. PubMed ID: 28916397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personalized physiologic flow waveforms improve wave reflection estimates compared to triangular flow waveforms in adults.
    Shenouda N; Stock JM; Patik JC; Chirinos JA; Edwards DG
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2021 May; 320(5):H1802-H1812. PubMed ID: 33710924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of pressure wave reflection: getting the timing right!
    Segers P; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; De Bacquer D; Van Bortel LM; De Backer G; Gillebert TC; Verdonck PR
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Sep; 28(9):1045-56. PubMed ID: 17827652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wave intensity of aortic root pressure as diagnostic marker of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
    Hametner B; Parragh S; Weber T; Wassertheurer S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179938. PubMed ID: 28628659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Superiority of a Representative MRI Flow Waveform over Doppler Ultrasound for Aortic Wave Reflection Assessment in Children and Adolescents With/Without a History of Heart Disease.
    Mynard JP; Kowalski R; Harrington HA; Kondiboyina A; Smolich JJ; Cheung MMH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Dec; 51(12):2772-2784. PubMed ID: 37561232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pulse wave analysis on fingertip arterial pressure: effects of age, gender and stressors on reflected waves and their relation to brachial and femoral artery blood flow.
    Ahlund C; Pettersson K; Lind L
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2008 Mar; 28(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 18034848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of noninvasive methods to assess wave reflection and pulse transit time from the pressure waveform alone.
    Kips JG; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; Westerhof BE; Gillebert TC; Van Bortel LM; Segers P
    Hypertension; 2009 Feb; 53(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 19075098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study.
    Papaioannou TG; Argyris A; Protogerou AD; Vrachatis D; Nasothimiou EG; Sfikakis PP; Stergiou GS; Stefanadis CI
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 169(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24063914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between wasted pressure effort and left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: influence of arterial wave reflection.
    Hashimoto J; Nichols WW; O'Rourke MF; Imai Y
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 18202668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reservoir and excess pressures predict cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.
    Hametner B; Wassertheurer S; Hughes AD; Parker KH; Weber T; Eber B
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 171(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 24315153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indices of pulse wave analysis are better predictors of left ventricular mass reduction than cuff pressure.
    Hashimoto J; Imai Y; O'Rourke MF
    Am J Hypertens; 2007 Apr; 20(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 17386343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of wave reflection using peripheral blood pressure waveforms.
    Kim CS; Fazeli N; McMurtry MS; Finegan BA; Hahn JO
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jan; 19(1):309-16. PubMed ID: 25561452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards new indices of arterial stiffness using systolic pulse contour analysis: a theoretical point of view.
    Chemla D; Plamann K; Nitenberg A
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 51(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18287877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central aortic stiffness is increased in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Desai AS; Mitchell GF; Fang JC; Creager MA
    J Card Fail; 2009 Oct; 15(8):658-64. PubMed ID: 19786254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subject-specific pulse wave propagation modeling: Towards enhancement of cardiovascular assessment methods.
    Poleszczuk J; Debowska M; Dabrowski W; Wojcik-Zaluska A; Zaluska W; Waniewski J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190972. PubMed ID: 29324835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arterial pressure pulse wave separation analysis using a multi-Gaussian decomposition model.
    Manoj R; Raj KV; Nabeel PM; Sivaprakasam M; Joseph J
    Physiol Meas; 2022 May; 43(5):. PubMed ID: 35537402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The underlying mechanism of intersite discrepancies in ejection time measurements from arterial waveforms and its validation in the Framingham Heart Study.
    Liu J; Pahlevan NM
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2021 Jul; 321(1):H135-H148. PubMed ID: 34018849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.