431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25572115)
1. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study.
Ribeiro AA; Purger F; Rodrigues JA; Oliveira PR; Lussi A; Monteiro AH; Alves HD; Assis JT; Vasconcellos AB
Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vivo comparison of radiographic and clinical examination with separation for assessment of approximal caries in primary teeth.
Coutinho TC; daRocha Costa C
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 25517582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro performance of methods of approximal caries detection in primary molars.
Braga MM; Morais CC; Nakama RC; Leamari VM; Siqueira WL; Mendes FM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):e35-41. PubMed ID: 19778733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
de Souza JF; Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vivo and In Vitro performance of Conventional Methods, DIAGNOdent, and an Electronic Caries Monitor for Occlusal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth.
Kucukyilmaz E; Sener Y; Botsali MS
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):E14-22. PubMed ID: 26314593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars.
Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Stich H; Lussi A
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 20505963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the discomfort reported by children on the performance of approximal caries detection methods.
Novaes TF; Matos R; Raggio DP; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2010; 44(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 20861630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro detection of secondary caries associated with composite restorations on approximal surfaces using laser fluorescence.
Rodrigues JA; Neuhaus KW; Hug I; Stich H; Seemann R; Lussi A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 20945748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth.
Rocha RO; Ardenghi TM; Oliveira LB; Rodrigues CR; Ciamponi AL
Caries Res; 2003; 37(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 14571122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of laser fluorescence devices for detection of caries in primary teeth.
Cınar C; Atabek D; Odabaş ME; Olmez A
Int Dent J; 2013 Apr; 63(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 23550523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters.
Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM; Pardi V
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19553711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods.
Attrill DC; Ashley PF
Br Dent J; 2001 Apr; 190(8):440-3. PubMed ID: 11352392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of DIAGNOdent and two conventional diagnostic methods.
Reis A; Zach VL; de Lima AC; de Lima Navarro MF; Grande RH
J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):76-82. PubMed ID: 15688963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual and radiographic diagnosis of occlusal caries in first permanent molars and in second primary molars.
Ketley CE; Holt RD
Br Dent J; 1993 May; 174(10):364-70. PubMed ID: 8494666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histological validation of a laser fluorescence device for occlusal caries detection in primary molars.
Apostolopoulou D; Lagouvardos P; Kavvadia K; Papagiannoulis L
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Nov; 10 Suppl 1():11-5. PubMed ID: 19863893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
