These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25573498)

  • 1. Increasing participation in critical care studies: the need to understand surrogate decision-makers for critically ill patients.
    Hartog CS; Aneman A; Ricou B
    Intensive Care Med; 2015 Feb; 41(2):345-7. PubMed ID: 25573498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research.
    Newman JT; Smart A; Reese TR; Williams A; Moss M
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2590-4. PubMed ID: 22732283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).
    Burns KE; Zubrinich C; Tan W; Raptis S; Xiong W; Smith O; McDonald E; Marshall JC; Saginur R; Heslegrave R; Rubenfeld G; Cook DJ;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 23525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surrogate decision makers' attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients.
    Barrett KA; Ferguson ND; Athaide V; Cook DJ; Friedrich JO; McDonald E; Pinto R; Smith OM; Stevenson J; Scales DC
    Intensive Care Med; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1616-23. PubMed ID: 22825282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten things to know about critically ill elderly patients.
    Leblanc G; Boumendil A; Guidet B
    Intensive Care Med; 2017 Feb; 43(2):217-219. PubMed ID: 27492269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surrogate consent for genomics research in intensive care.
    Shelton AK; Fish AF; Cobb JP; Bachman JA; Jenkins RL; Battistich V; Freeman BD
    Am J Crit Care; 2009 Sep; 18(5):418-26; quiz 427. PubMed ID: 19723862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.
    White DB; Ernecoff N; Buddadhumaruk P; Hong S; Weissfeld L; Curtis JR; Luce JM; Lo B
    JAMA; 2016 May; 315(19):2086-94. PubMed ID: 27187301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Echography is mandatory for the initial management of critically ill patients: no.
    Volpicelli G; Balik M; Georgopoulos D
    Intensive Care Med; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1766-8. PubMed ID: 25288208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Echography is mandatory for the initial management of critically ill patients: yes.
    McLean A; Lamperti M; Poelaert J
    Intensive Care Med; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1763-5. PubMed ID: 25288207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Echography is mandatory for the initial management of critically ill patients: we are not sure.
    Mayo PH; Maury E
    Intensive Care Med; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1760-2. PubMed ID: 25288206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing the informed consent process for critical care research: strategies from a thromboprophylaxis trial.
    Smith OM; McDonald E; Zytaruk N; Foster D; Matte A; Clarke F; Fleury S; Krause K; McArdle T; Skrobik Y; Cook DJ
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2013 Dec; 29(6):300-9. PubMed ID: 23871290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does difficulty functioning in the surrogate role equate to vulnerability in critical illness research? Use of path analysis to examine the relationship between difficulty providing substituted judgment and receptivity to critical illness research participation.
    Clarridge BR; Bolcic-Jankovic D; LeBlanc J; Mahmood RS; Kennedy CR; Freeman BD
    J Crit Care; 2015 Dec; 30(6):1310-6. PubMed ID: 26304514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
    White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different research designs and their characteristics in intensive care.
    Nedel WL; Silveira FD
    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2016 Sep; 28(3):256-260. PubMed ID: 27737421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of prognostic data presentation format on perceived risk among surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chapman AR; Litton E; Chamberlain J; Ho KM
    J Crit Care; 2015 Apr; 30(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 25480457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The implications of intensive care unit capacity strain for the care of critically ill patients.
    Kohn R; Halpern SD; Kerlin MP
    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2016; 28(4):366-368. PubMed ID: 28099633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and initial evaluation of an online decision support tool for families of patients with critical illness: A multicenter pilot study.
    Van Scoy LJ; Chiarolanzio PJ; Kim C; Heyland DK
    J Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 39():18-24. PubMed ID: 28131020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethical Issues in Surgical Critical Care: The Complexity of Interpersonal Relationships in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.
    Sur MD; Angelos P
    J Intensive Care Med; 2016 Aug; 31(7):442-50. PubMed ID: 25990272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluid resuscitation in the critically ill: what is the next challenge?
    Hammond N; Finfer S
    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2015; 27(4):309-11. PubMed ID: 26761466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision making for life sustaining therapies in pediatric intensive care: who should decide?
    Khilnani P
    Indian J Pediatr; 2014 Dec; 81(12):1283-4. PubMed ID: 25385076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.