These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Estimation of a k-monotone density: characterizations, consistency and minimax lower bounds. Balabdaoui F; Wellner JA Stat Neerl; 2010 Feb; 64(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 20436949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bounds on the average causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance by covariate adjustment. Shan N; Xu PF Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 27062639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bounds on causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance under monotonicity assumptions about covariates. Chiba Y Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3249-59. PubMed ID: 19777494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A general instrumental variable framework for regression analysis with outcome missing not at random. Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Wirth KE Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1123-1131. PubMed ID: 28230909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters. Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonparametric bounds on the effect of deductibles in health care insurance on doctor visits - Swiss evidence. Gerfin M; Schellhorn M Health Econ; 2006 Sep; 15(9):1011-20. PubMed ID: 16596581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On Partial Identification of the Natural Indirect Effect. Miles C; Kanki P; Meloni S; Tchetgen ET J Causal Inference; 2017 Sep; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 38962169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of Instrumental Variable Bounds for Data Missing Not at Random. Marden JR; Wang L; Tchetgen EJT; Walter S; Glymour MM; Wirth KE Epidemiology; 2018 May; 29(3):364-368. PubMed ID: 29394191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bounds on causal interactions for binary outcomes. Sjölander A; Lee W; Källberg H; Pawitan Y Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):500-5. PubMed ID: 24621448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sharp nonparametric bounds and randomization inference for treatment effects on an ordinal outcome. Chiba Y Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(25):3966-3975. PubMed ID: 28703430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple imputation for non-monotone missing not at random data using the no self-censoring model. Ren B; Lipsitz SR; Weiss RD; Fitzmaurice GM Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Oct; 32(10):1973-1993. PubMed ID: 37647237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Bounds to Compare the Strength of Exchangeability Assumptions for Internal and External Validity. Breskin A; Westreich D; Cole SR; Edwards JK Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 188(7):1355-1360. PubMed ID: 30834430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled direct and mediated effects: definition, identification and bounds. VanderWeele TJ Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2011 Sep; 38(3):551-563. PubMed ID: 25309023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Partially linear monotone methods with automatic variable selection and monotonicity direction discovery. Engebretsen S; Glad IK Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(25):3549-3568. PubMed ID: 32851696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Causal Isotonic Regression. Westling T; Gilbert P; Carone M J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2020 Jul; 82(3):719-747. PubMed ID: 33986625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Size and Depth of Monotone Neural Networks: Interpolation and Approximation. Mikulincer D; Reichman D IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2024 Apr; PP():. PubMed ID: 38648127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bounds on controlled direct effects under monotonic assumptions about mediators and confounders. Chiba Y Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):628-37. PubMed ID: 20886528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies. Liu T; Hogan JW Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):671-686. PubMed ID: 33213292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bounding the average causal effect in Mendelian randomisation studies with multiple proposed instruments: An application to prenatal alcohol exposure and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Diemer EW; Havdahl A; Andreassen OA; Munafò MR; Njolstad PR; Tiemeier H; Zuccolo L; Swanson SA Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2023 May; 37(4):326-337. PubMed ID: 36722651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]