BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25575086)

  • 1. Validation of an administrative coding algorithm for classifying surgical indication and operative features of spine surgery.
    Kazberouk A; Martin BI; Stevens JP; McGuire KJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 25575086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.
    Martin BI; Lurie JD; Tosteson AN; Deyo RA; Tosteson TD; Weinstein JN; Mirza SK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(9):769-79. PubMed ID: 24525995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database does not accurately reflect surgical indications for fusion.
    Gologorsky Y; Knightly JJ; Chi JH; Groff MW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):984-93. PubMed ID: 25325170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of a combined current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code algorithm in classifying cervical spine surgery for degenerative changes.
    Wang MC; Laud PW; Macias M; Nattinger AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(22):1843-8. PubMed ID: 21245779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microscopic anterior foraminal decompression combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shin SH; Choi WG; Hwang BW; Tsang YS; Chung ER; Lee HC; Lee SJ; Lee SH
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1190-9. PubMed ID: 24094988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Discogenic low back pain and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis - how appropriate is surgical treatment?].
    Mayer HM
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 11793155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bae HW; Rajaee SS; Kanim LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):916-26. PubMed ID: 23324922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Modhia U; Takemoto S; Braid-Forbes MJ; Weber M; Berven SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 23324923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of Using Claims Data to Measure Safety of Lumbar Fusion Surgery.
    Patel NK; Moses RA; Martin BI; Lurie JD; Mirza SK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(9):682-691. PubMed ID: 27557452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SF-6D values stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Canan CE; Burke LO; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E804-8. PubMed ID: 22228327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.
    Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Hahn S; Kim MJ; Lee KS; Park BJ
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 24017959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The indications for lumbar spinal fusion with and without instrumentation.
    Hanley EN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Dec; 20(24 Suppl):143S-153S. PubMed ID: 8747269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbosacral spine by decompression and dynamic transpedicular stabilisation].
    Hrabálek L; Wanek T; Adamus M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 22094157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 in spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease--part 1: Large series diagnosis related outcomes and complications with 2- to 9-year follow-up.
    Crandall DG; Revella J; Patterson J; Huish E; Chang M; McLemore R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):1128-36. PubMed ID: 23370679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
    Sears W
    Spine J; 2005; 5(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15749617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
    Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of reoperations after surgical treatment of degenerative cervical spine disorders: a report on 900 cases.
    Greiner-Perth R; Allam Y; El-Saghir H; Röhl F; Franke J; Böhm H
    Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2009 Feb; 70(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 19191203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.