371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25575252)
1. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery.
Cullis PS; Gudlaugsdottir K; Andrews J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175213. PubMed ID: 28384296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.
Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A
Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses.
Zhang H; Han J; Zhu YB; Lau WY; Schwartz ME; Xie GQ; Dai SY; Shen YN; Wu MC; Shen F; Yang T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():4-16. PubMed ID: 26117439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compliance of Systematic Reviews in Plastic Surgery With the PRISMA Statement.
Lee SY; Sagoo H; Whitehurst K; Wellstead G; Fowler AJ; Agha RA; Orgill D
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016; 18(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 26719993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation.
Gianola S; Gasparini M; Agostini M; Castellini G; Corbetta D; Gozzer P; Li LC; Sirtori V; Taricco M; Tetzlaff JM; Turolla A; Moher D; Moja L
Phys Ther; 2013 Nov; 93(11):1456-66. PubMed ID: 23744458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topics and PRISMA Checklist Compliance for Meta-analyses in Dermatology: Journal Case Study.
Poveda-Montoyo I; Belinchón-Romero I; Romero-Pérez D; Ramos-Rincón JM
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Dec; 27(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 31969243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading orthopedics journals: A systematic review.
Zhi X; Zhang Z; Cui J; Zhai X; Chen X; Su J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 28928047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview.
Martins DE; Astur N; Kanas M; Ferretti M; Lenza M; Wajchenberg M
Spine J; 2016 May; 16(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 26826347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
