These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25576020)

  • 1. Striving for perfection and falling short: The influence of goals on probability matching.
    Gao J; Corter JE
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):748-59. PubMed ID: 25576020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction Time of Erroneous Responses in the Go/No-Go Paradigm.
    Leblanc-Sirois Y; Braun CMJ; Elie-Fortier J
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Sep; 65(5):314-321. PubMed ID: 30451107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. There are at least two kinds of probability matching: evidence from a secondary task.
    Otto AR; Taylor EG; Markman AB
    Cognition; 2011 Feb; 118(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 21145046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability matching involves rule-generating ability: a neuropsychological mechanism dealing with probabilities.
    Unturbe J; Corominas J
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Sep; 21(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 17784810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More heads choose better than one: Group decision making can eliminate probability matching.
    Schulze C; Newell BR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Jun; 23(3):907-14. PubMed ID: 26424221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploration and recency as the main proximate causes of probability matching: a reinforcement learning analysis.
    Feher da Silva C; Victorino CG; Caticha N; Baldo MVC
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15326. PubMed ID: 29127418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
    Stanovich KE; West RF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):672-95. PubMed ID: 18361678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability matching: encouraging optimal responding in humans.
    Fantino E; Esfandiari A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11901961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involvement of basal ganglia and orbitofrontal cortex in goal-directed behavior.
    Hollerman JR; Tremblay L; Schultz W
    Prog Brain Res; 2000; 126():193-215. PubMed ID: 11105648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Banking on a bad bet. Probability matching in risky choice is linked to expectation generation.
    James G; Koehler DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):707-11. PubMed ID: 21551340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The smart potential behind probability matching.
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 19019351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Undesirable Choice Biases with Small Differences in the Spatial Structure of Chance Stimulus Sequences.
    Herrera D; Treviño M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136084. PubMed ID: 26305097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internally generated sequences in learning and executing goal-directed behavior.
    Pezzulo G; van der Meer MA; Lansink CS; Pennartz CM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 Dec; 18(12):647-57. PubMed ID: 25156191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Of matchers and maximizers: How competition shapes choice under risk and uncertainty.
    Schulze C; van Ravenzwaaij D; Newell BR
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():78-98. PubMed ID: 25868112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game.
    Lee D; Conroy ML; McGreevy BP; Barraclough DJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15561500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response selection in dual task paradigms: observations from random generation tasks.
    Dirnberger G; Jahanshahi M
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(3):535-48. PubMed ID: 20232508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic Integration of Value Information into a Common Probability Currency as a Theory for Flexible Decision Making.
    Christopoulos V; Schrater PR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015; 11(9):e1004402. PubMed ID: 26394299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-making processes: sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities.
    Boyer TW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 17321540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception.
    Wozny DR; Beierholm UR; Shams L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 20700493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of randomness in binary sequences: Normative, heuristic, or both?
    Reimers S; Donkin C; Le Pelley ME
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():11-25. PubMed ID: 29202364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.