These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25576107)

  • 1. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using novel preparation systems.
    Uzunoglu E; Görduysus M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 25576107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
    Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
    De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems.
    Borges ÁH; Pereira TM; Porto AN; de Araújo Estrela CR; Miranda Pedro FL; Aranha AM; Guedes OA
    J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 26614016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth.
    Gungor OE; Kustarci A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):490-495. PubMed ID: 27805889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: assessment of the apically extruded material.
    Silva EJ; Sá L; Belladonna FG; Neves AA; Accorsi-Mendonça T; Vieira VT; De-Deus G; Moreira EJ
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2077-80. PubMed ID: 25442728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.
    Alkahtani A; Al Khudhairi TD; Anil S
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 14():12. PubMed ID: 24512441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant using different file systems.
    Kütük B; Akpınar KE; Altunbaş D
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1555-1560. PubMed ID: 29378986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
    Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
    Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation.
    Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Positive and Negative Pressure Irrigation Systems in Association with Different Irrigants.
    Barbosa-Ribeiro M; Arruda-Vasconcelos R; Fabretti FL; Silva EJNL; De-Deus G; Gomes BPFA
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29898066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of maintaining apical patency on periapical extrusion.
    Lambrianidis T; Tosounidou E; Tzoanopoulou M
    J Endod; 2001 Nov; 27(11):696-8. PubMed ID: 11716084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Apical Preparation Size and Working Length on Debris Extrusion.
    Silva EJ; Teixeira JM; Kudsi N; Sassone LM; Krebs RL; Coutinho-Filho TS
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 27007341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Different Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Irrigant and Debris during Canal Preparation Using K3XF Instruments.
    Toyoğlu M; Altunbaş D
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1565-1568. PubMed ID: 28735794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris and Irrigant Produced by Different Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Primary Teeth.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 26718292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File.
    Farmakis ET; Sotiropoulos GG; Abràmovitz I; Solomonov M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2131-2138. PubMed ID: 26759337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of coronal flaring on apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using single-file systems.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Üstün Y; Akpek F; Aktı A; Topçuoğlu G
    Int Endod J; 2016 Sep; 49(9):884-889. PubMed ID: 26283644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.