448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25576112)
1. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of altering the reciprocation range on the fatigue life and the shaping ability of WaveOne nickel-titanium instruments.
Saber Sel D; Abu El Sadat SM
J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):685-8. PubMed ID: 23611391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.
Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2053-6. PubMed ID: 25301350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography.
Celikten B; Uzuntas CF; Kursun S; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Orhan K; Demiralp KÖ
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25887521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Gergi R; Arbab-Chirani R; Osta N; Naaman A
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1223-7. PubMed ID: 25069937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems.
Marzouk AM; Ghoneim AG
J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):906-9. PubMed ID: 23791261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of single cone obturation performance of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Oct; 72(7):537-42. PubMed ID: 24460041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars.
van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA
J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion.
Giuliani V; Di Nasso L; Pace R; Pagavino G
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1468-71. PubMed ID: 25146035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in centring and shaping ability using three nickel–titanium instrumentation techniques analysed by micro-computed tomography (μCT).
Stern S; Patel S; Foschi F; Sherriff M; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):514-23. PubMed ID: 22625863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness of TRUShape and ProTaper Next systems in curved root canals using micro-computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Al-Dharrab AA; Abbas HM; Elsaka SE
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27669727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
