166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25576112)
21. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile.
Zanette F; Grazziotin-Soares R; Flores ME; Camargo Fontanella VR; Gavini G; Barletta FB
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 24767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary PathFile in maxillary first molars curved canals.
Pasqualini D; Bianchi CC; Paolino DS; Mancini L; Cemenasco A; Cantatore G; Castellucci A; Berutti E
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 22341081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT evaluation of apical canal transportation associated with stainless steel hand files, oscillatory technique and pro taper rotary system.
Hartmann MS; Fontanella VR; Vanni JR; Fornari VJ; Barletta FB
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 21861027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Gergi R; Osta N; Bourbouze G; Zgheib C; Arbab-Chirani R; Naaman A
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 24717063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal.
Rios Mde A; Villela AM; Cunha RS; Velasco RC; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Bueno CE
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 24666908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
Özer SY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path.
Bürklein S; Poschmann T; Schäfer E
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1231-4. PubMed ID: 25069939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers.
Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Dinçol ME; Dağlaroğlu R
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):756-62. PubMed ID: 22432937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence.
Paqué F; Zehnder M; De-Deus G
J Endod; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1394-7. PubMed ID: 21924189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Geometric analysis of maxillary first premolar prepared by two nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
Al-Sudani D; Almalki M; Al-Shahrani S; Ahlquist M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 25095839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files.
McRay B; Cox TC; Cohenca N; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
Quintessence Int; 2014 Feb; 45(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24389561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of reciprocation usage of nickel-titanium rotary files on the cyclic fatigue resistance.
Lee W; Hwang YJ; You SY; Kim HC
Aust Endod J; 2013 Dec; 39(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 24279662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative micro-computed tomography evaluation of apical root canal transportation with the use of ProTaper, RaCe and Safesider systems in human teeth.
Ceyhanli KT; Erdilek N; Tatar I; Cetintav B
Aust Endod J; 2014 Apr; 40(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 24697959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion.
Gambarini G; Gergi R; Naaman A; Osta N; Al Sudani D
Int Endod J; 2012 Sep; 45(9):802-6. PubMed ID: 22429241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
