These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25576118)

  • 1. Orthodontic management of a patient with cerebral palsy: six years follow-up.
    Sabuncuoglu FA; Özcan E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):491-5. PubMed ID: 25576118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
    Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional and fixed orthodontic treatment in a child with cerebral palsy.
    İşcan HN; Metin-Gürsoy G; Kale-Varlik S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 24703291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Harrison JE; Worthington HV; O'Brien KD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; (11):CD003452. PubMed ID: 24226169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic Consideration in Patients with Beta-Thalassemia Major: Case Report and Literature Review.
    Einy S; Hazan-Molina H; Ben-Barak A; Aizenbud D
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 27472573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined orthodontic-orthopedic approach: a second choice in some surgical cases.
    Dahan J
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e35-45. PubMed ID: 19641767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction of severe class II skeletal discrepancy with fixed twin block and high pull headgear--a case report.
    Patel D; Parekh H; Gupta B; Purl T
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 25745711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of Severe Class II Malocclusion With Sequential Fixed Functional and Orthodontic Appliances: A Case for MOrthRCSEd Examination.
    Li LC; Rabie AB; Wong RW
    Singapore Dent J; 2010 Jun; 31(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 23739255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report.
    Shah AH
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Class II subdivision treatment and stability with asymmetric Herbst appliance: A case report.
    Lorenzoni DC; Barbosa OTAM; Cury-Saramago AA; Mattos CT
    Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100838. PubMed ID: 38290193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of severe Class II Division 1 deep overbite malocclusion without extractions in an adult.
    Horiuchi Y; Horiuchi M; Soma K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4 Suppl):S121-9. PubMed ID: 18407019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children.
    Harrison JE; O'Brien KD; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD003452. PubMed ID: 17636724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.