These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25576206)

  • 1. Shaping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Saleh AM; Vakili Gilani P; Tavanafar S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2015 Apr; 41(4):548-52. PubMed ID: 25576206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping Ability of Reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM Single-file Systems in Simulated S-shaped Canals.
    Özyürek T; Yılmaz K; Uslu G
    J Endod; 2017 May; 43(5):805-809. PubMed ID: 28292599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path.
    Bürklein S; Poschmann T; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1231-4. PubMed ID: 25069939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue Nickel-titanium Instruments.
    Gündoğar M; Özyürek T
    J Endod; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1192-1196. PubMed ID: 28527845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated L-shaped canals: OneShape, Hero Shaper, and Revo-S.
    Vakili-Gilani P; Tavanafar S; Saleh ARM; Karimpour H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):378. PubMed ID: 34311733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and Reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and Reciproc blue.
    Bürklein S; Flüch S; Schäfer E
    Odontology; 2019 Jan; 107(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 29777391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems.
    Versiani MA; Leoni GB; Steier L; De-Deus G; Tassani S; Pécora JD; de Sousa-Neto MD
    J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23880278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system.
    Liu R; Hou BX; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
    J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1054-6. PubMed ID: 23880276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo.
    Bürklein S; Jäger PG; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2017 Oct; 50(10):983-990. PubMed ID: 27809348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals.
    Yoo YS; Cho YB
    Restor Dent Endod; 2012 Nov; 37(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 23430033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion.
    Giuliani V; Di Nasso L; Pace R; Pagavino G
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1468-71. PubMed ID: 25146035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of brushing motion on the cutting behavior of 3 reciprocating files in oval-shaped canals.
    Alattar S; Nehme W; Diemer F; Naaman A
    J Endod; 2015 May; 41(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 25702856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Apical enlargement according to different pecking times at working length using reciprocating files.
    Jeon HJ; Paranjpe A; Ha JH; Kim E; Lee W; Kim HC
    J Endod; 2014 Feb; 40(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 24461419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. F360 and F6 Skytaper: SEM evaluation of cleaning efficiency.
    Dagna A; Gastaldo G; Beltrami R; Chiesa M; Poggio C
    Ann Stomatol (Roma); 2015; 6(3-4):69-74. PubMed ID: 26941891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.