These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25576547)

  • 1. Characteristics of the Cochrane Oral Health Group systematic reviews.
    Teich ST; Lang LA; Demko CA
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jan; 79(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 25576547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Status quo, issues, and challenges for acupuncture research evidence: an overview of clinical and fundamental studies.
    Cai Y; Shen J; Zhong D; Li Y; Wu T
    J Evid Based Med; 2012 Feb; 5(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 23528116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the evidence supporting dental procedures strong? A survey of Cochrane systematic reviews in oral health.
    Faggion CM
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3):131-134.e14. PubMed ID: 22935276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age.
    Villas Boas PJ; Spagnuolo RS; Kamegasawa A; Braz LG; Polachini do Valle A; Jorge EC; Yoo HH; Cataneo AJ; Corrêa I; Fukushima FB; do Nascimento P; Módolo NS; Teixeira MS; de Oliveira Vidal EI; Daher SR; El Dib R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):633-7. PubMed ID: 22747638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture for stroke.
    Zhang JH; Wang D; Liu M
    Neuroepidemiology; 2014; 42(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 24356063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care.
    El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):689-92. PubMed ID: 17683315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
    Pandis N; Fleming PS; Worthington H; Dwan K; Salanti G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137667. PubMed ID: 26368938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based pain management and palliative care in issue three for 2004 of The Cochrane Library.
    Wiffen PJ
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2005; 19(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 15814517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
    Afshari A
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Handsearching for randomized controlled clinical trials in German medical journals].
    Blümle A; Antes G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Feb; 133(6):230-4. PubMed ID: 18236347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting 'number needed to treat' in meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study.
    Naing C; Aung K; Mak JW
    J Evid Based Med; 2012 Nov; 5(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 23557504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Hewitt CE; Birks Y; Brabyn S; Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Hicks K; Hodgson R; Littlewood E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1016-24. PubMed ID: 24909873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of systematic reviews in clinical trials and narrative reviews in dermatology: is the best evidence being used?
    Conde-Taboada A; Aranegui B; García-Doval I; Dávila-Seijo P; González-Castro U
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2014 Apr; 105(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 24661956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry.
    Bader J; Ismail A; ; ;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):464-73. PubMed ID: 15127870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the global resource of eczema trials (GREAT database).
    Nankervis H; Devine A; Williams HC; Ingram JR; Doney E; Delamere F; Smith S; Thomas KS
    BMC Dermatol; 2015 Mar; 15():4. PubMed ID: 25887502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991-2014: A methodology study.
    Saltaji H; Ospina MB; Armijo-Olivo S; Agarwal S; Cummings GG; Amin M; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Sep; 147(9):720-728.e1. PubMed ID: 27155754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochrane systematic reviews in orthodontics.
    Delière M; Yan-Vergnes W; Hamel O; Marchal-Sixou C; Vergnes JN
    Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):278-92. PubMed ID: 20800563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Randomized clinical trials and systemic reviews in nursing literature: a comparison between German and international nursing research].
    Schlömer G
    Pflege; 1999 Aug; 12(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 10578913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.