These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25577405)

  • 1. Data-driven CT protocol review and management—experience from a large academic hospital.
    Zhang D; Savage CA; Li X; Liu B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 25577405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation and evaluation of a protocol management system for automated review of CT protocols.
    Grimes J; Leng S; Zhang Y; Vrieze T; McCollough C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):523-533. PubMed ID: 27685112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compliance with AAPM Practice Guideline 1.a: CT Protocol Management and Review - from the perspective of a university hospital.
    Szczykutowicz TP; Bour RK; Pozniak M; Ranallo FN
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5023. PubMed ID: 26103176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT and MRI Protocol Variation and Optimization at an Academic Medical Center.
    Glazer DI; DiPiro PJ; Shinagare AB; Huang RY; Wang A; Boland GW; Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Sep; 15(9):1254-1258. PubMed ID: 30082232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracking Patterns of Nonadherence to Prescribed CT Protocol Parameters.
    Szczykutowicz TP; Malkus A; Ciano A; Pozniak M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Feb; 14(2):224-230. PubMed ID: 27927592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the same page--physicist and radiologist perspectives on protocol management and review.
    Szczykutowicz TP; Siegelman J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):808-14. PubMed ID: 26065337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A proposed protocol for acceptance and constancy control of computed tomography systems: a Nordic Association for Clinical Physics (NACP) work group report.
    Kuttner S; Bujila R; Kortesniemi M; Andersson H; Kull L; Østerås BH; Thygesen J; Tarp IS
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 23160544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Wiki Based CT Protocol Management System.
    Szczykutowicz TP; Rubert N; Belden D; Ciano A; Duplissis A; Hermanns A; Monette S; Saldivar EJ
    Radiol Manage; 2015; 37(6):25-9; quiz 30-1. PubMed ID: 26710573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation of system performance, quality control standards and adherence to international FDG-PET/CT imaging guidelines. A national survey of PET/CT operations in Austria.
    Rausch I; Bergmann H; Geist B; Schaffarich M; Hirtl A; Hacker M; Beyer T
    Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(6):242-8. PubMed ID: 25131649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution.
    Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Miller CM; Nelson RC; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1141-7. PubMed ID: 19770340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quality assurance protocol for CT scanners.
    Droege RT
    Radiology; 1983 Jan; 146(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 6849059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT protocol review and optimization.
    Kofler JM; Cody DD; Morin RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 24589402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT and MR Protocol Standardization Across a Large Health System: Providing a Consistent Radiologist, Patient, and Referring Provider Experience.
    Sachs PB; Hunt K; Mansoubi F; Borgstede J
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Feb; 30(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 27448401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support?
    Lehnert BE; Bree RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Mar; 7(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 20193924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance in CT with the Belgian protocol and the new European acceptability criteria.
    Bosmans H; Lemmens K; Malone J; Oyen R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 23233502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of examination times between CT scanners: are the newer scanners faster?
    Herts BR; Perl J; Seney C; Lieber ML; Davros WJ; Baker ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9423589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National survey of computed tomography unit capacity: an update. Special report.
    Terhorst LL
    Radiology; 1984 Oct; 153(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 6473781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners.
    Shekhar R; Walimbe V; Raja S; Zagrodsky V; Kanvinde M; Wu G; Bybel B
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 46(9):1488-96. PubMed ID: 16157532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.