131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25577417)
21. The significance of CT scan or MRI in the evaluation of salivary gland tumors.
Kim KH; Sung MW; Yun JB; Han MH; Baek CH; Chu KC; Kim JH; Lee KS
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Dec; 25(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 9853663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Radiodiagnosis of salivary gland neoplasia].
Dobromyslova NA
Vopr Onkol; 2000; 46(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 11147429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance and computed tomography enterography in the diagnosis of small intestinal tumors.
Li R; Ye S; Zhou C; Liu F; Li X
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16687. PubMed ID: 38144202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of bladder cancer: comparison with computed tomography (CT) and transurethral ultrasonography (US).
Nishimura K; Hida S; Nishio Y; Ohishi K; Okada Y; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Nishibuchi S
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1988 Sep; 18(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 3045372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging for detection of colorectal tumors: A meta-analysis.
Yu Q; Liu J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016 Dec; 12(Supplement):C241-C243. PubMed ID: 28230026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
Marinovich ML; Houssami N; Macaskill P; Sardanelli F; Irwig L; Mamounas EP; von Minckwitz G; Brennan ME; Ciatto S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Mar; 105(5):321-33. PubMed ID: 23297042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Imaging of the salivary glands. CT and MRI].
Freling NJ
Radiologe; 1994 May; 34(5):264-72. PubMed ID: 8052721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detection of primary and metastatic malignancies: a meta-analysis.
Li B; Li Q; Nie W; Liu S
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 24355655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
Wang WH; Zheng CB; Gao JN; Ren SS; Nie GY; Li ZQ
Gland Surg; 2022 Feb; 11(2):330-340. PubMed ID: 35284306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy.
Cronin P; Dwamena BA; Kelly AM; Carlos RC
Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):772-82. PubMed ID: 18235105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced US, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
Muhi A; Ichikawa T; Motosugi U; Sou H; Nakajima H; Sano K; Sano M; Kato S; Kitamura T; Fatima Z; Fukushima K; Iino H; Mori Y; Fujii H; Araki T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Aug; 34(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21780227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Liver lesion detection and characterization in patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of low radiation dose non-enhanced PET/CT, contrast-enhanced PET/CT, and liver MRI.
Cantwell CP; Setty BN; Holalkere N; Sahani DV; Fischman AJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 18830103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Coronary artery disease diagnosis with 64-slice spiral CT coronary artery angiography in China and abroad: a meta analysis].
Li WL; Zhai XH; Yu XW; Yang J; Banymandhub S; Guo YM; Guo YL
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 39(6):553-8. PubMed ID: 21924084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the salivary gland tumors.
Hisatomi M; Asaumi J; Yanagi Y; Unetsubo T; Maki Y; Murakami J; Matsuzaki H; Honda Y; Konouchi H
Oral Oncol; 2007 Oct; 43(9):940-7. PubMed ID: 17257881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations.
Lee SS; Park SH; Kim HJ; Kim SY; Kim MY; Kim DY; Suh DJ; Kim KM; Bae MH; Lee JY; Lee SG; Yu ES
J Hepatol; 2010 Apr; 52(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 20185194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors with multiparametric 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Pinker K; Bogner W; Baltzer P; Karanikas G; Magometschnigg H; Brader P; Gruber S; Bickel H; Dubsky P; Bago-Horvath Z; Bartsch R; Weber M; Trattnig S; Helbich TH
Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Jul; 20(13):3540-9. PubMed ID: 24963052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
Kinkel K; Kaji Y; Yu KK; Segal MR; Lu Y; Powell CB; Hricak H
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):711-8. PubMed ID: 10478237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Perfusion in ENT imaging.
Espinoza S; Malinvaud D; Siauve N; Halimi P
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2013 Dec; 94(12):1225-40. PubMed ID: 24231345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancer.
Zhang Y; Ren H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(5):862-868. PubMed ID: 29237918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
