BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25577489)

  • 1. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal spatial congruence effects: visual dominance in conditions of increased and reduced selection difficulty.
    Tomko L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):1035-1050. PubMed ID: 27612465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-evaluating visual and auditory dominance through modality switching costs and congruency analyses.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jun; 140(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 22622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.
    Barrett DJ; Krumbholz K
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):11-20. PubMed ID: 22975896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Willmes K; Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 26813694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection.
    Lawo V; Fels J; Oberem J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2010-24. PubMed ID: 25248101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intentional preparation of auditory attention-switches: Explicit cueing and sequential switch-predictability.
    Seibold JC; Nolden S; Oberem J; Fels J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1382-1395. PubMed ID: 28631530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the influence of sound parameters on crossmodal cuing in different regions of space.
    Lee J; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():96-103. PubMed ID: 29438877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shifts of attention in light and in darkness: an ERP study of supramodal attentional control and crossmodal links in spatial attention.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Forster B; Driver J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 15(3):308-23. PubMed ID: 12527104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):548-58. PubMed ID: 16132965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.