739 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25577548)
21. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical Stability Afforded by Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with and without Interbody Support Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Godzik J; Martinez-Del-Campo E; Newcomb AGUS; Reis MT; Perez-Orribo L; Whiting AC; Singh V; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e439-e445. PubMed ID: 29462730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Direct lateral approach to lumbar fusion is a biomechanically equivalent alternative to the anterior approach: an in vitro study.
Laws CJ; Coughlin DG; Lotz JC; Serhan HA; Hu SS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):819-25. PubMed ID: 21971125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques.
Cain CM; Schleicher P; Gerlach R; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Kandziora F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2631-6. PubMed ID: 16319749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of cage design, supplemental posterior instrumentation and approach on primary stability of a lumbar interbody fusion - A biomechanical in vitro study.
Schmoelz W; Sandriesser S; Loebl O; Bauer M; Krappinger D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Oct; 48():30-34. PubMed ID: 28719806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical evaluation of different surgical procedures in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in vitro.
Cao Y; Liu F; Wan S; Liang Y; Jiang C; Feng Z; Jiang X; Chen Z
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Nov; 49():91-95. PubMed ID: 28898815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanics of a lumbar interspinous anchor with transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation.
Kaibara T; Karahalios DG; Porter RW; Kakarla UK; Reyes PM; Choi SK; Yaqoobi AS; Crawford NR
World Neurosurg; 2010 May; 73(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 20920945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Posterior augmentation of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive fixation versus pedicle screws in vitro.
Beaubien BP; Mehbod AA; Kallemeier PM; Lew WD; Buttermann GR; Transfeldt EE; Wood KB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Oct; 29(19):E406-12. PubMed ID: 15454721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Finite element analysis and cadaveric cinematic analysis of fixation options for anteriorly implanted trabecular metal interbody cages.
Berjano P; Blanco JF; Rendon D; Villafañe JH; Pescador D; Atienza CM
Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24 Suppl 7():918-23. PubMed ID: 26452680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Bhatia NN; Lee KH; Bui CN; Luna M; Wahba GM; Lee TQ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E79-85. PubMed ID: 21629171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical Analysis of an Interspinous Process Fixation Device with In Situ Shortening Capabilities: Does Spinous Process Compression Improve Segmental Stability?
Wagener C; Gandhi A; Ferry C; Farmer S; DenHaese R
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e483-e494. PubMed ID: 32891838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.
Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads.
Phillips FM; Cunningham B; Carandang G; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov L; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1731-6. PubMed ID: 15303015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of cage height on the flexibility and load sharing of lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral and bilateral instrumentation: a biomechanical study.
Du L; Sun XJ; Zhou TJ; Li YC; Chen C; Zhao CQ; Zhang K; Zhao J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Nov; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29162074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical comparison of supplemental posterior fixations for two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang M; Tang SJ; McGrady LM; Rao RD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Mar; 227(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 23662340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Which posterior instrumentation is better for two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion: translaminar facet screw or pedicle screw?
Hou Y; Shen Y; Liu Z; Nie Z
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Jan; 133(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 23109094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interspinous-Interbody Fusion via a Strictly Lateral Surgical Approach: A Biomechanical Stabilization Comparison to Constructs Requiring Both Lateral and Posterior Approaches.
Hedman TP; Ohnmeiss DD; Leasure J; Raji OR; Hochschuler SH
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41918. PubMed ID: 37583745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
